Table 3 Reliability of SEP components across visits.

From: Optimized Measurement Parameters of Sensory Evoked Cortical Potentials to Assess Human Bladder Afferents - A Randomized Study

Location	Marker	Run	0.5 Hz					1.1 Hz					1.6 Hz
Location	Marker	Run	n	ICC	Lower CI	Upper CI	ICC category	n	ICC	Lower CI	Upper CI	ICC category	n	ICC	Lower CI	Upper CI	ICC category
Dome	P1	1	19	0.588	0.185	0.820	fair	20	0.805	0.570	0.918	excellent	19	0.245	−0.132	0.595	poor
Dome	P1	1_2	20	0.705	0.389	0.872	good	20	0.623	0.252	0.833	good	20	0.322	−0.069	0.648	poor
Dome	P1	1_5	20	0.710	0.396	0.875	good	20	0.600	0.218	0.821	good	20	0.395	−0.008	0.699	poor
Trigone	P1	1	20	0.719	0.424	0.878	good	18	0.787	0.515	0.915	excellent	16	0.784	0.491	0.919	excellent
Trigone	P1	1_2	20	0.740	0.456	0.888	good	20	0.348	−0.114	0.681	poor	17	0.756	0.456	0.903	excellent
Trigone	P1	1_5	20	0.945	0.865	0.978	excellent	20	0.700	0.378	0.870	good	20	0.876	0.710	0.949	excellent
Dome	N1	1	19	0.872	0.698	0.948	excellent	20	0.869	0.702	0.946	excellent	19	0.595	0.209	0.821	fair
Dome	N1	1_2	20	0.886	0.695	0.956	excellent	20	0.935	0.846	0.974	excellent	20	0.489	0.079	0.759	fair
Dome	N1	1_5	20	0.904	0.758	0.962	excellent	20	0.937	0.849	0.974	excellent	20	0.518	0.113	0.776	fair
Trigone	N1	1	20	0.898	0.763	0.958	excellent	18	0.883	0.715	0.955	excellent	16	0.718	0.357	0.892	good
Trigone	N1	1_2	20	0.904	0.778	0.961	excellent	20	0.853	0.665	0.939	excellent	17	0.869	0.665	0.951	excellent
Trigone	N1	1_5	20	0.912	0.792	0.964	excellent	20	0.817	0.592	0.924	excellent	20	0.951	0.833	0.982	excellent
Dome	P2	1	19	0.751	0.462	0.896	excellent	20	0.773	0.470	0.907	excellent	19	0.495	0.090	0.765	fair
Dome	P2	1_2	20	0.780	0.531	0.906	excellent	20	0.748	0.454	0.893	good	20	0.469	0.074	0.745	fair
Dome	P2	1_5	20	0.858	0.677	0.941	excellent	20	0.772	0.515	0.902	excellent	20	0.494	0.102	0.759	fair
Trigone	P2	1	20	0.816	0.518	0.929	excellent	18	0.676	0.311	0.866	good	16	0.561	0.127	0.819	fair
Trigone	P2	1_2	20	0.878	0.712	0.951	excellent	20	0.700	0.382	0.870	good	17	0.619	0.231	0.841	good
Trigone	P2	1_5	20	0.851	0.668	0.938	excellent	20	0.775	0.515	0.905	excellent	20	0.780	0.531	0.906	excellent
Dome	P1N1	1	19	0.427	−0.037	0.735	fair	20	0.782	0.536	0.907	excellent	19	0.190	−0.285	0.587	poor
Dome	P1N1	1_2	20	0.554	0.148	0.798	fair	20	0.591	0.229	0.813	fair	20	0.219	−0.227	0.593	poor
Dome	P1N1	1_5	20	0.607	0.234	0.824	good	20	0.450	0.025	0.738	fair	20	0.111	−0.325	0.515	poor
Trigone	P1N1	1	20	0.774	0.519	0.904	excellent	18	0.429	−0.050	0.743	fair	16	0.750	0.420	0.905	excellent
Trigone	P1N1	1_2	20	0.831	0.621	0.929	excellent	20	0.537	0.124	0.789	fair	17	0.681	0.317	0.871	good
Trigone	P1N1	1_5	20	0.739	0.449	0.888	good	20	0.545	0.135	0.793	fair	20	0.548	0.153	0.793	fair
Dome	P2N1	1	19	0.468	0.059	0.750	fair	20	0.715	0.383	0.879	good	19	0.286	−0.157	0.642	poor
Dome	P2N1	1_2	20	0.603	0.242	0.820	good	20	0.583	0.209	0.810	fair	20	0.340	−0.093	0.670	poor
Dome	P2N1	1_5	20	0.674	0.345	0.856	good	20	0.522	0.135	0.775	fair	20	0.301	−0.134	0.645	poor
Trigone	P2N1	1	20	0.716	0.302	0.888	good	18	0.474	0.006	0.767	fair	16	0.616	0.201	0.845	good
Trigone	P2N1	1_2	20	0.882	0.603	0.958	excellent	20	0.558	0.153	0.799	fair	17	0.526	0.105	0.794	fair
Trigone	P2N1	1_5	20	0.866	0.697	0.944	excellent	20	0.618	0.245	0.830	good	20	0.583	0.216	0.809	fair
			3.1 Hz
Pudendus	P40	1_5	39	0.826	0.692	0.904	excellent
Pudendus	N50	1_5	39	0.916	0.846	0.955	excellent
Pudendus	P65	1_5	39	0.869	0.764	0.929	excellent
Pudendus	N85	1_5	39	0.890	0.800	0.941	excellent
Pudendus	P40N50	1_5	39	0.278	−0.042	0.545	poor
Pudendus	P65N85	1_5	39	0.556	0.294	0.740	fair

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values with confidence intervals for measures of P1, N1, P2 latency and P1N1 and P2N1 peak-to-peak amplitudes for the locations bladder dome (BD) and trigone (TG). In addition, ICC values are indicated for pudendal SSEP latencies (P40, N50, P65, N85) and peak-to-peak amplitudes (40N50, P65N85).

Back to article page

Table 3 Reliability of SEP components across visits.

Search

Quick links