Table 2 The AIC model comparison analysis (for negative urgency and positive urgency separately).
Model | Fixed effects | AIC | Akaike weight |
|---|---|---|---|
M0 | ~1 | 619.74 | 0.09 |
M1 | NU + SPAI | 618.34 | 0.18 |
M2 | Condition + SPAI | 617.19 | 0.32 |
M3 | Condition + NU + SPAI | 617.90 | 0.22 |
M4 | Condition + NU + SPAI + Condition × NU | 618.52 | 0.17 |
M0 | ~1 | 619.74 | 0.04 |
M1 | PU + SPAI | 618.31 | 0.09 |
M2 | Condition + SPAI | 617.19 | 0.16 |
M3 | Condition + PU + SPAI | 617.57 | 0.13 |
M4 | Condition + PU + SPAI + Condition × PU | 614.56 | 0.59 |