Table 5 Comparison of MLE to NFDPM/ACM and nicotine between user groups.

From: A cross-category puffing topography, mouth level exposure and consumption study among Italian users of tobacco and nicotine products

Product

User group

MLE to NFDPM (mg/session)

MLE to ACM (mg/session)

MLE to nicotine (mg/session)

MLE to NFDPM (mg/day)

MLE to ACMa (mg/day)

MLE to nicotineb (mg/day)

Mean (±SD)

Pr > (t)c

Mean (±SD)

Pr > (t)c

Mean (±SD)

Pr > (t)c

Mean (±SD)

Pr > (t)c

Mean (±SD)

Pr > (t)c

Mean (±SD)

Pr > (t)c

C651

1

19.0 (±7.7)

0.1201

—

—

1.55 (±0.63)

0.1195

256.4 (±150.4)

0.1471

—

—

20.9 (±12.3)

0.1467

3

16.7 (±7.6)

1.36 (±0.62)

218.2 (±141.9)

17.8 (±11.6)

IS1.0(T)

1

—

—

180.1 (±137.8)

0.2735

0.69 (±0.53)

0.2698

—

—

1883.1 (±897.6)

0.6693

7.3 (±3.5)

0.6693

2

209.2 (±157.4)

 

0.80 (±0.60)

1914.2 (±679.4)

 

7.4 (±2.6)

  1. aMLE to ACM/day was calculated from MLE to nicotine/day using the relationship between ACM and nicotine, determined from calibration smoking (see section 2.4.2).
  2. bFor IS1.0(T), MLE to nicotine per day was calculated by multiplying the average daily consumption e-liquid (mL) per day by the concentration of nicotine (mg/mL) in the cartridge.
  3. cValues > 0.05 indicate no statistically significant difference.
Back to article page