Table 1 ΔAIC and associated rank for each single muscle models, 2 multiple regression models that are coherent with our hypothesis and the model combining different muscles with the lowest ΔAIC.
From: Complex couplings between joints, muscles and performance: the role of the wrist in grasping
Force | Length | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linear | Quadratic | Linear | Quadratic | ||||||||||
Rank | ΔAIC | \({R}_{adj}^{2}\) | Rank | ΔAIC | \({R}_{adj}^{2}\) | Rank | ΔAIC | \({R}_{adj}^{2}\) | Rank | ΔAIC | \({R}_{adj}^{2}\) | ||
Single Muscle Mode | FCR | 15 | 77.99 | 0.00 | 15 | 80.84 | 0.03 | 7 | 9.74 | 0.26 | 11 | 27.83 | 0.28 |
FDS | 7 | 19.66 | 0.26 | 8 | 14.91 | 0.31 | 15 | 50.89 | 0.09 | 13 | 32.46 | 0.26 | |
EDC | 13 | 68.91 | 0.05 | 14 | 67.86 | 0.09 | 13 | 40.17 | 0.13 | 15 | 43.54 | 0.22 | |
ECR | 10 | 34.92 | 0.20 | 11 | 43.59 | 0.20 | 11 | 13.59 | 0.25 | 14 | 32.61 | 0.26 | |
Multiple Muscle Models | FDS + ECR | 3 | 2.00 | 0.33 | 4 | 3.50 | 0.36 | 12 | 14.60 | 0.25 | 10 | 22.25 | 0.31 |
FCR + FDS + EDC + ECR | 2 | 1.99 | 0.34 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 4 | 3.49 | 0.30 | 3 | 3.01 | 0.39 | |
Most Plausible | Values | 1 | 0.00 | 0.34 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
Muscles | FDS + EDC + ECR | FCR + FDS + EDC + ECR | FCR + EDC | FDS + EDC + ECR | |||||||||
