Figure 3
Interpretive drawings comparing the m1 of Anthradapis (A) with the m1 (upper row) and m2 (lower row) of other Asian adapoids (B–K). (B–I) Paleogene sivaladapids. (B) Hoanghonius stehlini (m1 of IVPP V10220 (mirrored) after ref. 48; m2 of the holotype (University of Uppsala, unnumbered; mirrored) after ref. 35). (C) Rencunius zhoui (m1-m2 of the holotype IVPP 5312 after ref. 49). (D) Wailekia orientale (m2 of the holotype TF 2632 after ref. 37). (E) Paukkaungia parva (m1 NMMP 55 (holotype), m2 NMMP 57 after ref. b36). (F) Kyitchaungia takaii (holotype m2 NMMP 28 after ref. 36). (G) Laomaki yunnanensis (m1 IVPP V 22711 and m2 IVPP V 22712 after ref. 19). (H) Yunnanadapis folivorus (m1 and m2 of the holotype IVPP V 22702 (mirrored) after ref. 19). (I) Guangxilemur singsilai (upper row: m1 or m2 DBC 2171 (mirrored); lower row: m1 or m2 DBC 2170. After ref. 38). (J–K) Asiadapidae (after ref. 31). (J) Asiadapis cambayensis (m1-m2 of the holotype GU 6). (K) Marcgodinotius indicus (m1 GU 44 and m2 GU 45 (both mirrored)). Teeth not on scale except for molars belonging to the same species for which proportions are respected.
