Figure 7
From: Differentiating external zeitgeber impact on peripheral circadian clock resetting
Determination of zeitgeber impact on different circadian rhythms under ZD conditions. (a) Phase shifts between ZD in-phase and anti-phase days for different endocrine, tissue clock, and behavioural rhythms conditions (means ± SEM, n = 3 for tissues/hormones, n = 58 for activity, one-sample t tests were used to determine statistical differences to the two zeitgeber rhythms (0 = feeding; ± 12 = light; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ****p < 0.0001 vs. light, #p < 0.05, ####p < 0.005 vs. food). (b) Model of circadian rhythm adaptation under conflicting zeitgeber (ZD) conditions with phase coherence on in-phase and maximal misalignment on anti-phase days.
