Table 1 Comparison of DC-MRF and ICP-MS Concentration Measurements.
Gd Measurement | All Studies (n = 40) | Single Agent Only (n = 14) | Dual Agent Only (n = 8) |
|---|---|---|---|
Intra-Class Correlation | |||
ICC | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.40 |
Pearson Correlation (DC-MRF vs ICP-MS) | |||
R2 | 0.89 | 0.79 | 0.76 |
p-value | <1e-6 | 0.00002 | 0.005 |
Bland-Altman Analysis (DC-MRF vs ICP-MS) | |||
R2 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.60 |
p-value | 0.02 | 0.45 | 0.02 |
Dy Measurement | All Studies (n = 40) | Single Agent Only (n = 17) | Dual Agent Only (n = 8) |
Intra-Class Correlation | |||
ICC | 0.90 | 0.78 | 0.88 |
Pearson Correlation (DC-MRF vs ICP-MS) | |||
R2 | 0.83 | 0.64 | 0.73 |
p-value | <1e-6 | 0.0001 | 0.007 |
Bland-Altman Analysis (DC-MRF vs ICP-MS) | |||
R2 | 0.009 | 0.15 | 0.0002 |
p-value | 0.56 | 0.13 | 0.97 |