Table 4 Secondary outcome — Association of ostium and ICO grading with baseline characteristics and postoperative anatomical & functional outcomes.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ostium grade | |||||
Number of patients | 3 | 28 | 26 | 50 | n.a. |
Group 1:2:3:4 (%) | 3:0:0:0 (100:0:0:0) | 8:10:6:4 (32:35:24:14) | 8:6:7:5 (32:21:28:18) | 6:13:12:19 (24:45:48:70) | 0.003* |
Female (%) | 3 (100) | 25 (89) | 21 (80) | 41 (82) | 0.30 |
Right (%) | 1 (33) | 17 (61) | 11 (42) | 23 (46) | 0.49 |
Surgeon A (%) | 1 (33) | 9 (32) | 15 (58) | 19 (38) | 0.50 |
Granuloma (%) | 3 (100) | 14 (58) | 11 (48) | 37 (84) | 0.09 |
Local anesthesia (%) | 3:0 (100) | 22 (79) | 17 (66) | 24 (48) | 0.001* |
Age (years) | 61 ± 11.53 | 61 ± 11.70 | 66 ± 11.96 | 59 ± 10.44 | 0.51 |
Osteotomy size (mm) | 20 ± 5.66 | 20 ± 2.41 | 20 ± 3.60 | 21 ± 3.49 | 0.05 |
Anatomical Success (%) | 2 (66.7) | 24 (86) | 23 (89) | 50 (100) | 0.004* |
Functional Success (%) | 2 (100) | 18 (75) | 17 (74) | 48 (96) | 0.04* |
ICO grade | |||||
Number of patients | 4 | 11 | 26 | 66 | n.a. |
Group 1:2:3:4 (%) | 3:1:0:0 (75:25:0:0) | 4:3:3:1 (37:27:27:9) | 3:7:7:9 (12:27:27:34) | 15:18:15:18 (23:27:23: 27) | 0.092 |
Female (%) | 4 (100) | 9 (82) | 21 (81) | 56 (85) | 0.87 |
Right-side (%) | 2 (50) | 7 (64) | 11 (43) | 32 (49) | 0.72 |
Surgeon A (%) | 1 (25) | 3 (27) | 10 (39) | 30 (46) | 0.20 |
Granuloma (%) | 3 (100) | 5 (46) | 16 (70) | 41 (28) | 0.59 |
Local anesthesia (%) | 2 (50) | 6 (55) | 15 (58) | 43 (65) | 0.34 |
Age (years) | 61 ± 11.53 | 61 ± 11.70 | 66 ± 11.96 | 59 ± 10.44 | 0.93 |
Osteotomy size (mm) | 20 ± 5.66 | 20 ± 2.41 | 20 ± 3.60 | 21 ± 3.49 | 0.67 |
Anatomical Success (%) | 2 (50) | 8 (73) | 25 (96) | 64 (97) | <0.001* |
Functional Success (%) | 1 (50) | 7 (88 | 23 (92) | 54 (85) | 0.94 |
