Figure 4 | Scientific Reports

Figure 4

From: Differential Abundance Analysis with Bayes Shrinkage Estimation of Variance (DASEV) for Zero-Inflated Proteomic and Metabolomic Data

Figure 4

Comparison of differential abundance analysis results from DASEV and TLK based on simulations from the first scenario. Panels a and b are the true positive rate of top-ranked features with a sample size of 100 and 200 per group, respectively. Panels c and d are numbers of true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) features for a reported FDR threshold of 1%, 5% or 10% with a sample size of 100 and 200 per group, respectively. The percentage shown on top of a bar is the observed FDR. The results were averaged from 100 simulations.

Back to article page