Figure 9 | Scientific Reports

Figure 9

From: Power and pitfalls of computational methods for inferring clone phylogenies and mutation orders from bulk sequencing data

Figure 9

Comparison of the performances of clone prediction methods with low sequencing depth (50x). Average MLTED (a), TreeVec (b), and RF (c) scores were compared between datasets with 200x and 50x coverage. MA datasets were used for those with 200x coverage. We generated 50x datasets by using true clone genotypes and clone frequencies of MA datasets. Error bars indicate a single standard deviation.

Back to article page