Figure 2

ROC curves for predicting the development of ACLF (a) and poor prognosis of ACLF patients (b). For predicting the development of ACLF, CTP score had a significantly higher AUROC than MELD score and CLIF-C ADs (0.92, 0.88, and 0.86 for CTP score, MELD score, and CLIF-C ADs, respectively; all pā<ā0.005). For predicting the poor prognosis of ACLF patients, COSSH-ACLFs had a significantly better diagnostic performance than CLIF-C ACLFs, CLIF-C OFs, MELD score, and CTP score (AUROC of 0.89, 0.83, 0.81, 0.67, and 0.58 for COSSH-ACLFs, CLIF-C ACLFs, CLIF-C OFs, MELD score, and CTP score, respectively; all pā<ā0.05).