Table 2 Effects of feeding sows diets supplemented with lysozyme on microbiota alpha diversity index of sows.

From: Fecal bacteria and metabolite responses to dietary lysozyme in a sow model from late gestation until lactation

Item

time

CON

Treatment

LZM 300

P-value

LZM 150

diet

time

diet*time

Observed species

d 1

1463.33 ± 186.88

1361.50 ± 81.21

1531.67 ± 155.56*

0.19

0.02

<0.01

d 7

1480.67 ± 268.49

1733.50 ± 174.18*

1691.67 ± 132.01*

d 21

1744.17 ± 139.69a*

1628.33 ± 88.08a*

1201.00 ± 170.23b

Chao 1

d 1

1655.92 ± 202.79

1541.86 ± 121.58

1718.32 ± 166.63

0.11

<0.01

<0.01

d 7

1672.27 ± 272.25

2072.34 ± 325.19*

1906.23 ± 106.26*

d 21

2034.73 ± 153.27a*

1909.28 ± 131.70a*

1359.10 ± 191.20b

Shannon

d 1

7.50 ± 0.25a

7.32 ± 0.12b

7.58 ± 0.05a*

<0.01

<0.01

<0.001

d 7

7.43 ± 0.21a

7.52 ± 0.28a

7.15 ± 0.53b

d 21

7.58 ± 0.12a

7.31 ± 0.17ab

6.62 ± 0.17b

  1. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Sows were regarded as the experimental units, n = 6 for each treatment. LZM 150 = control diet + lysozyme 150 mg/kg, LZM 300 = control diet + lysozyme 300 mg/kg. a,bWithin a row, means with different superscripts are different (P < 0.05). *Within a coloum in the same index at different day, means with asterisk denotes different (P < 0.05).