Table 4 Performance comparison of different potentials.

From: Neighborhood Preference of Amino Acids in Protein Structures and its Applications in Protein Structure Assessment

  

DFIRE2

DOPE

RW

RWplus

GOAP

NEPRE-R

NEPRE-F

I-TASSER(a)

Top1§

53

48

54

56*

3

50

48

(56)#

Top5

55

48

55

56

14

50

48

 

Top10

55

49

55

56

17

53

50

I-TASSER(b)

Top1

0

11

0

0

3

20

22

(56)

Top5

2

25

1

2

3

27

28

 

Top10

2

29

4

4

3

29

33

Rosetta

Top1

0

7

0

0

1

26

34

(58)

Top5

2

31

2

2

7

45

49

 

Top10

5

43

8

8

7

51

53

Modeller

Top1

2

6

2

2

1

14

13

(20)

Top5

4

8

4

4

5

16

16

 

Top10

6

10

6

7

6

17

18

3DRobot

Top1

38

63

0

0

4

129

149

(200)

Top5

49

141

5

8

13

160

173

 

Top10

60

165

9

10

15

176

183

  1. #Number of proteins.
  2. §The number of cases whose native structures are in the n best models selected based on scoring functions.
  3. *Numbers in bold font indicate the best scoring function for that assessment.
Back to article page