Table 2 Effect of ML on microbial counts and chemical composition of barley silage during aerobic exposure.

From: Impact of molasses and microbial inoculants on fermentation quality, aerobic stability, and bacterial and fungal microbiomes of barley silage

Items1

Treatments

Aerobic exposure days

SEM

P Value

0

2

5

7

D

A3

A×D

LAB (Log10cfu/g FM)

CK2

6.69bA

6.07cB

5.37cC

4.90cD

0.016

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

M

7.27 aA

7.30bA

6.72bB

5.88bC

ML

7.37aB

7.99 aA

7.33aB

6.99aC

Yeast (Log10cfu/g FM)

CK

3.04aC

5.26aB

6.14 aA

6.32 aA

0.017

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

M

2.88aD

4.22bC

5.42bB

5.97bA

ML

2.10bD

3.31cC

4.26cB

4.71cA

AB (Log10cfu/g FM)

CK

2.58aC

2.85aC

4.20aB

5.65 aA

0.029

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

M

2.41acD

2.86aC

3.80bB

5.17bA

ML

2.14bcC

2.28bC

2.84cB

3.80cA

DM (g/kg)

CK

333.67 A

321.33B

308.33bC

295.67bD

0.708

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

M

336.00 A

324.00B

310.33bC

300.33bC

ML

331.00

328.00

325.67a

324.33a

NDF (%)

CK

45.93B

47.90aB

50.93 aA

52.70 aA

0.165

<0.001

<0.001

0.606

M

45.57D

47.57aC

49.87aB

52.23 aA

ML

43.70 C

43.90bC

46.77bB

48.97bA

ADF (%)

CK

34.17B

35.10B

37.97 aA

38.60 aA

0.180

<0.001

<0.001

0.992

M

33.73B

34.30B

36.77acA

38.00acA

ML

32.50B

32.77B

35.47bcA

36.27bcA

  1. Data are presented as means of three replicates. Values in the same row (A–D) or in the same column (a–c) with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
  2. 1CK, control; M, molasses; ML, molasses and microbial inoculants.
  3. 2LAB, Lactic acid bacteria; AB, Aerobic bacteria; DM, Dry matter.
  4. 3A, Additive; D, ensilage time; A × D, the interaction between additive and ensilage time.