Table 3 Mensa vs. Control differences in covariates potentially influencing sleep timing.

From: The relationship between chronotype and intelligence: the importance of work timing

 

t

df

p

Mean Difference

SE

95% CI

Lower

Upper

Work start time

−2.33

751.00

0.02

−0:13:59.63

0:06:00.957

−0:25:48.23

−0:02:11.02

Commute duration

0.97

756.00

0.33

1.41

1.46

−1.46

4.27

Cigarettes/day

3.44

806.00

0.00

1.27

0.37

0.55

2.00

Beer/day

2.57

807.00

0.01

0.17

0.07

0.04

0.31

Glass wine/day

0.69

807.00

0.49

0.02

0.03

−0.04

0.09

Liquor/day

0.05

807.00

0.96

<0.01

0.01

−0.02

0.03

Coffee/day

2.79

807.00

0.01

0.35

0.13

0.11

0.60

Caffeine drink/day

−1.96

807.00

0.05

−0.16

0.08

−0.32

0.00

Tea/day

−1.54

807.00

0.12

−0.16

0.11

−0.37

0.04

Hypnotic/day

−1.11

807.00

0.27

−0.01

0.01

−0.03

0.01

  1. Negative effect sizes indicate higher values in Mensa members. Commute duration is given in minutes. Respondents could provide their consumption of psychoactive substances in monthly, weekly or daily quantities which was always converted to daily values.