Table 2 Achieving remission according to Dtotal at diagnosis.
Low Dtotal (<50 nmol/L) | Normal Dtotal (≥50 nmol/L) | Contrast between groups | |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary outcome: Remission. (%) | N = 45 (71%) | N = 51 (64%) | Crude analysisa: OR 1.4, 95% CI (0.7; 2.7) p = 0.33 Logistic regressionb: OR 1.4, 95% CI (0.7; 2.9) p = 0.34 Adjusted logistic regressionc: OR 2.6, 95% CI (1.1; 5.9) p = 0.03 |
Best-case scenario assuming the 15 patients not evaluated for year on, all did achieved remission | N = 49 (73%) | N = 62 (68%) | Crude analysisa: OR 1.3, 95% CI (0.6; 2.6) p = 0.50 Logistic regressionb: OR 1.3, 95% CI (0.6; 2.6) p = 0.51 Adjusted logistic regressionc: OR 2.0 95% CI (0.9, 4.3) p = 0.09 |
Worst-case scenario assuming the 15 patients not evaluated for year one, all did not achieved remission | N = 45 (67%) | N = 51 (56%) | Crude analysisa: OR 1.6, 95% CI (0.8; 3.1) p = 0.16 Logistic regressionb: OR 1.6, 95% CI (0.8; 3) p = 0.2 Adjusted logistic regressionc: OR 2.9, 95% CI (1.3; 6.2) p = 0.01 |
Change in disease activity markers after 1 year according to Dtotal group at time of diagnosis | |||
Change in HAQ | Mean: −0.6 95% CI (−0.7; −0.5) | Mean: −0.6 95% CI (−0.7; −0.5) | Least Squares Mean Difference: Crude analysis: −0.1, 95% CI (−0.2;0.1) p = 0.48 |
Change in NTJ | Mean: −9.7 95%CI (−10.9; 8.8) | Mean: −8.6 95% CI (−9.5; 7.8) | Least Squares Mean Difference: Crude analysis: 1.1, 95% CI (−0.2; 2.4) p = 0.09 |
Change in NSJ | Mean: −8.8 95% CI (−9.3; −8.3) | Mean: −8.1 95% CI (−8.1; −7.7) | Least Squares Mean Difference: Crude analysis: 0.7, 95% CI (0.0; 1.3) p = 0.04 |
Change in VASdoctor global | Mean: −47.7 95% CI (−51; −44.4) | Mean: −44.7 95% CI (−47.5; −41.8) | Least Squares Mean Difference: Crude analysis: 3.2, 95% CI (−1.3; 7.5) p = 0.17 |
Change in VASpatient-pain | Mean: −29.7 95% CI (−34.9; −24.5) | Mean: −28.2 95% CI (−32.7; −23.6) | Least Squares Mean Difference: Crude analysis: 1.6, 95% CI (−5.3; 8.5) p = 0.65 |
Change in VASpatient global | Mean: −31.6 95% CI (−37; −26.2) | Mean: −28.9 95% CI (−33.7; −24.1) | Least Squares Mean Difference: Crude analysis: 2.7, 95% CI (−4.5; 10) p = 0.46 |
Change in ESR, mm/hour | Mean: −12.8 95% CI (−16.3; −9.3) | Mean: −14.2 95% CI (−17.3; −11.1) | Least Squares Mean Difference: Crude analysis: −1.4, 95% CI (−6.2; 3.3) p = 0.55 |
Change in CRP, mg/l | Mean: −21.1 95% CI (−25.2; −16.9) | Mean: −20.4 95% CI (−24.1; −16.7) | Least Squares Mean Difference: Crude analysis: 0.6, 95% CI (−4.9; 6.2) p = 0.82 |
Change in DAS28-CRP | Mean: −3 95% CI (−3.3; −2.7) | Mean: −2.7 95% CI (−2.9; −2.4) | Least Squares Mean Difference: Crude analysis:0.3, 95% CI (−0.1; 0.7) p = 0.08 |