Figure 2
Top 10 markers and enriched ontology terms of interest in each response category. Each box represents a category of response (as in Fig. 1). For each category, top 10 annotated markers for which we had the most confidence in their categorisation (markers were ranked on R2 and p-values; see Supplementary Tables 2–6 for full set of parameters used to categorise and/or rank these markers) are listed, one or two of these are represented in plots showing stimulated versus baseline abundances (in counts per million) across individuals (solid line indicates significant relationship between baseline and stimulated abundance; dashed line indicates a slope equal to one and the same intercept for reference; note the differing axes of these plots). In the case of the convergent response category, which only included a total of six annotated markers, all markers are listed. Ontology terms of interest, from a functional enrichment analysis performed on all markers within a category (where possible), are also included (immune-related terms in black; non-immune-related terms in grey).
