Table 3 Characteristics of both groups with Wilcoxon test being used for comparison of differences, * indicating statistical significance (p < 0.05).

From: Comparison of Accuracy of Arrival-Time-Insensitive and Arrival-Time-Sensitive CTP Algorithms for Prediction of Infarct Tissue Volumes

 

Overall: (n: 54)

Group A: No/failed MT (n: 25)

Group B: Successful MT (n: 29)

p-value

Age, years, mean ± SD

67.0 ± 13.1

74.0 ± 10.0

61.0 ± 12.0

0.0004*

Male sex, n (%)

37 (68.5)

16 (64.0)

21 (72.4)

0.518

NIHSS, mean ± SD

15.3 ± 6.8

17.1 ± 5.4

14.2 ± 7.3

0.2038

Thrombolysis, n (%)

33 (61.1)

10 (40.0)

23 (79.3)

0.035*

Interval between initial and follow-up imaging, days, mean; SD

2.6 ± 2.7

2.9 ± 2.7

2.4 ± 2.6

0.48

Follow-up imaging with MRI, n (%)

39 (72.0)

10 (40.0)

29 (100.0)

<0.0001*

FIV, ml, mean; SD

48.4 ± 15.16

66.1 ± 68.1

36.5 ± 56.2

0.12

  1. MT = mechanical thrombectomy. SD = standard deviation. NIHSS = National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. FIV = final infarct volume.
Back to article page