Table 3 Biomass and nutrient remobilization amounts, remobilization efficiencies, and apparent contribution to the grain among different cultivation patterns over 2 years.

From: Integrating density and fertilizer management to optimize the accumulation, remobilization, and distribution of biomass and nutrients in summer maize

Biomass and nutrient	Year	Patterns	Remobilization amount (kg ha⁻¹)				Remobilization efficiency (%)				Apparent contribution to grain (%)
Biomass and nutrient	Year	Patterns	Stalk	Leaf	Husk + cob	Total	Stalk	Leaf	Husk + cob	Total	Stalk	Leaf	Husk + cob	Total
Biomass	2014	SH	593.5a	865.4a	− 292.7c	1,166.2a	11.4a	22.5b	− 2.1b	10.5a	4.2a	6.1b	− 2.1b	8.2c
		ONM	522.1b	907.3a	− 194.0b	1,235.4a	10.2b	24.4a	− 1.5a	11.3a	4.0a	6.9ab	− 1.5a	9.4b
		FP	436.2c	733.7b	− 146.6a	1,023.3b	9.8b	23.3ab	− 1.5a	11.0a	4.3a	7.3a	− 1.5a	10.1a
	2015	SH	765.8a	791.8a	− 162.5b	1,395.1a	12.8a	21.1a	− 1.1ab	11.1a	5.1a	5.3a	− 1.1ab	9.3a
		ONM	685.2b	795.4a	− 148.2b	1,332.4a	11.9ab	22.4a	− 1.0a	11.1a	4.8a	5.6a	− 1.0a	9.4a
		FP	527.7c	609.8b	− 125.7a	951.8b	11.5b	22.0a	− 1.2b	9.9b	4.9a	5.6a	− 1.2b	9.3a
N	2014	SH	21.5a	68.1a	6.1b	95.7a	31.0a	59.8a	2.2c	47.0a	7.9a	25.0c	2.2c	35.1c
		ONM	18.1b	64.2b	6.8b	89.1a	26.6b	58.1a	3.0b	44.9b	7.8a	27.8b	3.0b	38.6b
		FP	12.0c	55.6c	8.4a	76b	23.6c	57.8a	5.3a	45.9b	7.6a	35.2a	5.3a	48.1a
	2015	SH	31.7a	70.9a	15.3ab	117.9a	35.6a	58.2a	5.7b	48.5a	11.8ab	26.5a	5.7b	44.0b
		ONM	29.9a	57.5b	14.4b	101.8b	38.3a	55.3b	6.0b	48.1ab	12.6a	24.2b	6.0b	42.8c
		FP	20.0b	44.8c	16.2a	81c	32.0b	55.1b	9.3a	47.6b	11.5b	25.6ab	9.3a	46.4a
P	2014	SH	6.0a	10.4a	5.0a	21.4a	17.3a	34.8a	5.9b	28.9a	7.0a	12.2a	5.9c	25.1a
		ONM	3.9b	9.5a	5.0a	18.4b	12.5b	34.6a	6.4b	27.1ab	5.0b	12.2a	6.4b	23.6b
		FP	1.7c	7.2b	4.1b	13c	7.9c	29.8b	7.3a	24.6b	3.0c	12.9a	7.3a	23.2b
	2015	SH	19.0a	8.4a	3.6a	31a	36.7a	27.5a	3.7a	29.8a	19.7a	8.8a	3.7a	32.2a
		ONM	17.9a	7.9a	0.0c	25.8b	35.9a	26.4a	0.0c	26.4b	19.0a	8.4b	0.0c	27.4b
		FP	8.8b	6.0b	1.2b	16c	25.0b	26.3a	1.9b	21.8c	13.2b	9.1a	1.9b	24.2c
K	2014	SH	24.8a	24.7a	0.7a	50.2a	18.7a	36.8a	1.3c	23.3a	42.6a	42.5b	1.3b	86.4a
		ONM	19.4b	21.8b	0.8a	42b	15.2b	34.9a	1.5b	20.4b	37.5b	42.0b	1.5b	81.0b
		FP	8.8c	15.9c	0.7a	25.4c	10.7c	31.8b	2.0a	17.4c	24.6c	44.3a	2.0a	70.9c
	2015	SH	29.0a	25.7a	− 3.6b	51.1a	19.4a	36.6a	− 6.1b	20.4a	48.6a	43.1a	− 6.1b	85.6a
		ONM	25.2b	21.4b	− 3.3b	43.3b	18.5a	34.6b	− 6.1b	19.4a	46.4b	39.5b	− 6.1b	79.8b
		FP	13.5c	15.8c	− 0.1a	29.2c	13.4b	33.5b	− 0.4a	16.9b	35.1c	40.9b	− 0.4a	75.6c

SH, super high-yielding cultivation pattern; ONM, optimized nutrient management cultivation pattern; FP, local farmer's practice cultivation pattern. Different small letters indicate significantly differences at P < 0.05 as determined by the LSD test.

Back to article page

Table 3 Biomass and nutrient remobilization amounts, remobilization efficiencies, and apparent contribution to the grain among different cultivation patterns over 2 years.

Search

Quick links