Table 2 Dyads and subject within the dyad (where relevant) which participated in each of the coordination, prosociality and inequity aversion tasks, as well as the social relationship metrics (affiliation, rank distance and tolerance) of each of those dyads.
From: What matters for cooperation? The importance of social relationship over cognition
Dyad | % Cooperative success | Number of prosocial trials | Number of trials during reward inequity | Tolerance—% time spent co-feeding | Affiliation score | Rank distance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subject | Score | Subject | Score | |||||
Geronimo-Yukon | 87.5 | Yukon | 7 | Geronimo | 8 | 38.72 | 0.52 | 3 |
Kaspar-Shima | 54.76 | Kaspar | 1 | NA | NA | 54.17 | 0.752411576 | 20 |
Aragorn-Shima | 40.28 | Shima | 6 | NA | NA | 22.42 | 0.523636364 | 14 |
Aragorn-Tala | 88.89 | Aragorn | 44 | NA | NA | 57.06 | 1.817518248 | 3.2 |
Chitto-Shima | 95.83 | NA | NA | Chitto/Shima | 8/12 | 69.96 | 1.229681979 | 5 |
Kaspar-Aragorn | 20.83 | NA | NA | Kaspar/Aragorn | 1/30 | 28.61 | 1.089041096 | 5.9 |
Nanuk-Una | 83.33 | NA | NA | Nanuk | 20 | 13.18 | 0.730769231 | 2 |
Kenai-Amarok | NA | Kenai | 1 | Kenai/Amarok | 21/3 | 23.71 | 1.235294 | − 2 |
Wamblee-Yukon | NA | Wamblee | 24 | Wamblee | 1 | 33.52 | 0.91 | − 3 |
Kaspar-Chitto | 100 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 9.27 | 0.58 | 15 |
Kaspar-Tala | 64.58 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 40.43 | 1.374193548 | 9 |
Tala-Shima | 58.33 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 61.6 | 0.409556314 | 10 |
Tala-Chitto | 100 | Tala | 21 | NA | NA | 55.46 | 2.0 | 5.9 |
Aragorn-Chitto | 87.5 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 52.9 | 1.090909091 | 9 |
Ela-Etu | NA | Ela | 6 | NA | NA | 66.75 | 2.025478 | − 0.8 |
Etu-Maikan | NA | Etu | 3 | NA | NA | 57.76 | 0.90566 | − 3.8 |
