Table 2 Comparison of the classical indices and the indices stemming from the dynamical analysis of VO2 and HR: the gain \({\text{K}}\) and the decay time \({\uptau }\).

From: Validity of dynamical analysis to characterize heart rate and oxygen consumption during effort tests

Indices

Measurement 1

Measurement 2

p value

Cohen’s d

Group 1: training

MAP (W)

239.8 (55.2)

242.7 (60.0)

0.85

 

VO2 max (mL/min/kg)

33.6 (6.1)

42.5 (7.4)

 < 0.01

1.31

HR max (beat/min)

186.9 (10.1)

188.5 (7.2)

0.51

 

Power VT1 (W)

97.2 (50.7)

113.9 (40.9)

0.16

 

Power VT2 (W)

174.7 (54.5)

181.0 (49.8)

0.64

 

HRR (beat/min)

35.0 (12.3)

36.9 (9.6)

0.53

 

rHRI (beat/min/s)

0.5 (0.2)

0.5 (0.1)

0.84

 

\(\tau_{HR}\) (s)

106.4 (33.7)

108.3 (32.2)

0.82

 

\(K_{HR}\)(beat/min/W)

0.43 (0.13)

0.43 (0.12)

0.96

 

\(\tau_{{VO_{2} }}\)(s)

58.9 (19.9)

57.5 (27.7)

0.84

 

\(K_{{VO_{2} }}\)(mL/min/W)

6.9 (1.7)

9.2 (1.1)

 < 0.01

1.61

Group 2: deconditioning

MAP (W)

231.9 (31.1)

226.4 (27.4)

0.62

 

VO2 max (mL/min/kg)

62.5 (5.6)

49.9 (6.4)

 < 0.01

2.11

HR max (beat/min)

199.6 (7.2)

200.6 (5.0)

0.65

 

Power VT1 (W)

116.3 (20.8)

101.1 (16.9)

0.04

0.80

Power VT2 (W)

184.0 (26.6)

165.2 (29.0)

0.10

 

HRR (beat/min)

38.3 (9.0)

41.3 (10.3)

0.50

 

\(\tau_{HR}\) (s)

100.2 (37.3)

91.7 (25.1)

0.50

 

\(K_{HR}\)(beat/min/ W)

0.4 (0.1)

0.4 (0.1)

0.64

 

\(\tau_{{VO_{2} }}\)(s)

54.6 (19.4)

58.4 (30.9)

0.70

 

\(K_{{VO_{2} }}\)(mL/min/W)

12.6 (1.7)

8.9 (1.1)

 < 0.01

2.57

  1. Effort test measurements have been performed before and after the 3-month training in group 1 and before and after the 6-week deconditioning in group 2. VO2: O2 consumption; HR: Heart Rate; MAP: Maximal Aerobic Power; HRR: Heart Resting Rate; rHRI: rate of Heart Rate Increase; VT: Ventilatory Threshold. Group 2 does not have rHRI because of the protocol used: the linear increase of power does not allow proper calculation of rHRI. Effect size is given by the Cohen’s d of the t test.