Figure 6 | Scientific Reports

Figure 6

From: Comparing the visual outcome, visual quality, and satisfaction among three types of multi-focal intraocular lenses

Figure 6The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Postoperative questionnaire at 3 months. a Quality of vision (visual artifacts) questionnaire. The Mix-and-Match group showed the lowest frequency of visual artifacts at three months. Subgroup analysis showed the frequency of three symptoms (glare, hazy vision, and blurred vision) were significantly lower in the Mix-and-Match group than they were in the other groups (glare; p < 0.001 vs. EDOF and p < 0.001 vs. Trifocal, hazy vision; p = 0.002 vs. EDOF, blurred vision; p = 0.001 vs. EDOF and p = 0.007 vs. Trifocal). b Overall satisfaction (near, intermediate, and far) questionnaire. Three groups reported relatively similar satisfaction with far, intermediate, and near vision at three months. c Spectacle dependence (near, intermediate, and far) in the three groups. The EDOF group showed significantly higher near-vision spectacle dependence (p < 0.001 vs. Mix-and-Match, p < 0.001 vs. Trifocal) at 3 months. All outcomes were compared among the three groups. Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons: significant p values (p < 0.017) in bold with symbols. Spectacle dependence score scale: 0–10 (0—none; N—N out of 10; 10—Always). Quality of vision score scale: 0–3 (0—none; 1—mild; 2—moderate; 3—severe). Subjective satisfaction score scale: 1–5 (1—very unsatisfied; 2—unsatisfied; 3—neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; 4—satisfied; 5—very satisfied). *: Mix and Match versus EDOF, §: Mix and Match versus Trifocal, ¶: EDOF versus Trifocal.

Back to article page