Table 4 Comparisons of the diagnostic ability of asymmetry of OMAG parameters and structural thickness parameters for differentiating between the groups.

From: Asymmetry analysis of optical coherence tomography angiography macular perfusion density measurements in preperimetric and perimetric glaucoma

 

P-value

Control vs PPG

PPG vs PG

Control vs PG

Macular outer vessel length density asymmetry vs Average mGCIPL thickness asymmetry

0.982

0.077

0.202

Macular outer vessel length density asymmetry vs cpRNFL thickness asymmetry

0.546

0.118

0.266

Macular outer perfusion density asymmetry vs verage mGCIPL thickness asymmetry

0.685

0.039

0.369

Macular outer perfusion density asymmetry vs cpRNFL thickness asymmetry

0.415

0.060

0.384

  1. The p value: comparisons of AUC of the vessel density asymmetry parameters and structural thickness asymmetry parameters.
  2. AUC area under the receiver operation characteristic curve, adjusted for age, gender, and spherical equivalence.
Back to article page