Table 1 Results of binomial GLMs testing the influence of different predictor variables on the probability of TBEV infection after in vitro feeding.

From: Tick populations from endemic and non-endemic areas in Germany show differential susceptibility to TBEV

Variable

Estimate

SE

95% CI

p value

OR

95% CI

Intercept

2,347

550.9

 

 < 0.0001

  

Year (2019 vs. 2018)

− 1.163

0.273

[− 1.710, − 0.639]

 < 0.0001

0.313

[0.181, 0.528

Month

− 0.185

0.067

[− 0.319, − 0.056]

0.0057

0.831

[0.727, 0.946]

Tick origin (Haselmühl vs. Hanover)

0.842

0.243

[0.372, 1.326]

0.0005

2.322

[1.450, 3.767]

Borrelia spp. infection

0.041

0.361

[− 0.675, 0.745]

0.9107

1.041

[0.509, 2.106]

Rickettsia spp. Infection

0.199

0.222

[− 0.237, 0.637]

0.3700

1.221

[0.789, 1.890]

A. phagocytophilum infection

0.042

0.348

[− 0.661, 0.714]

0.9044

1.043

[0.516, 2.042]

Interaction tick origin Borrelia spp. infection

− 1.045

0.445

[− 1.922, − 0.175]

0.0188

0.352

[0.146, 0.839]

  1. SE standard error, CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio.
Back to article page