Table 1 Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of Chinese adolescents in Macau and mainland China.

From: Internet addiction among adolescents in Macau and mainland China: prevalence, demographics and quality of life

 

Total sample (n = 2892)

Mainland China (n = 2010)

Macau (n = 882)

Statistics

 

N

%

N

%

N

%

Χ2

dfa

p

Male

1527

53.8

1089

55.1

438

50.9

4.4

1

0.04

Religious beliefs

361

13.3

253

13.4

108

13.1

0.04

1

0.84

Only child

1072

40.3

900

48.4

172

21.5

168.1

1

 < 0.001

Senior secondary school

1425

49.5

1074

53.7

351

39.9

46.6

1

 < 0.001

Living with family

2303

80.1

1430

71.6

873

99.5

298.7

1

 < 0.001

Self-perceived physical health

      

71.0

2

 < 0.001

Good

1162

40.3

909

45.4

253

28.8

   

Fair

1552

53.9

992

49.6

560

63.7

   

Poor

167

5.8

101

5.0

66

7.5

   

Self-perceived weight

      

15.7

2

 < 0.001

Underweight

379

13.2

259

13.0

120

13.8

   

Normal

1611

56.2

1084

54.2

527

60.7

   

Overweight

878

30.6

657

32.9

221

25.5

   

Academic performance

      

16.4

3

0.001

Excellent

574

20.3

422

21.5

152

17.6

   

Good

878

31.0

632

32.2

246

28.4

   

Fair

778

27.5

525

26.7

253

29.2

   

Poor

600

21.2

385

19.6

215

24.8

   

Academic stress

      

7.4

2

0.02

Little

299

10.4

226

11.2

73

8.3

   

Fair

1874

64.9

1305

65.0

569

64.8

   

Great

714

24.7

478

23.8

236

26.9

   

Relationships with classmates

      

29.4

2

 < 0.001

Good

1422

49.3

1053

52.5

369

42.1

   

Fair

1358

47.1

894

44.5

464

52.9

   

Poor

104

3.6

60

3.0

44

5.0

   

Relationships with teachers

      

21.6

2

 < 0.001

Good

980

34.1

735

36.7

245

28.0

   

Fair

1789

62.2

1190

59.4

599

68.4

   

Poor

109

3.8

77

3.8

32

3.7

   

Relationships with family

      

63.4

2

 < 0.001

Good

1956

68.0

1452

72.6

504

57.5

   

Fair

851

29.6

506

25.3

345

39.4

   

Poor

70

2.4

43

2.1

27

3.1

   

Perception of family income

      

9.2

2

0.01

Affluent

346

12.0

255

12.8

91

10.4

   

Enough

2391

83.1

1634

81.7

757

86.1

   

Poor

141

4.9

110

5.5

31

3.5

   

Parental educational level

      

22.5

2

 < 0.001

High

768

26.6

585

29.1

183

20.7

   

Medium

1959

67.7

1310

65.2

649

73.6

   

Low

165

5.7

115

5.7

50

5.7

   

Parental work status

      

24.3

1

 < 0.001

Unemployed

656

23.2

510

25.7

146

17.2

   

Employed

2175

76.8

1472

74.3

703

82.8

   

Parental marital status

      

3.3

1

0.07

Married

2485

86.5

1747

87.3

738

84.7

   

Others

388

13.5

255

12.7

133

15.3

   

IA

684

23.7

397

19.8

287

32.5

55.5

1

 < 0.001

 

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Z

dfb

P

Age

15.1

1.7

15.1

1.7

15.1

1.6

–0.02

-

0.98

CESD total score

16.1

9.8

15.5

9.9

17.6

9.4

–6.4

-

 < 0.001

IA score

40.2

14.4

38.3

14.4

44.3

13.5

–11.7

-

 < 0.001

  1. Bolded values are p < 0.05; academic performance: excellent = 85–100, good = 75–85, fair = 65–75, poor =  < 65; Parental educational level: high = completion of at least undergraduate studies, medium = completion of secondary school studies, low = completion of primary school studies or not having completed any school study; Parental work status: unemployed = at least one parent is not employed, employed = both parents are employed; Parental marital status: married = complete original family with biological parents, others = remarriage, divorce, separation, or one or both parents passed away.
  2. CESD: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; IA: Internet addiction.
  3. aChi-square test.
  4. bMann–Whitney U test.