Table 1 Generated quantities of the coefficients of face exaggeration.

From: A new data-driven mathematical model dissociates attractiveness from sexual dimorphism of human faces

Rating

Sex of faces

Hypothesis

Linear term

EAP [95% CrI]

Quadratic term

EAP [95% CrI]

Attractiveness

Male faces

βattractiveness orthogonal to sexual dimorphism − βsexual dimorphism orthogonal to attractiveness

0.64 [0.44 to 0.83]

− 0.03 [− 0.08 to 0.01]

Attractiveness

Female faces

βattractiveness orthogonal to sexual dimorphism − βsexual dimorphism orthogonal to attractiveness

0.27 [0.11 to 0.43]

− 0.04 [− 0.09 to 0.00]

Sexual dimorphism

Male faces

βsexual dimorphism orthogonal to attractiveness − βattractiveness orthogonal to sexual dimorphism

0.92 [0.74 to 1.09]

− 0.06 [− 0.10 to − 0.02]

Sexual dimorphism

Female faces

βsexual dimorphism orthogonal to attractiveness − βattractiveness orthogonal to sexual dimorphism

0.68 [0.53 to 0.82]

0.01 [− 0.03 to 0.06]