Table 3 Correlations among manual and automated counts: spearman’s correlation matrix (n = 112). Values in bold represent significant correlations between manual and its respective automated count in each selected area.

From: Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue

 

Manual

Automated

TOTd

ED1a

ED2b

ED3c

ED1

ED2

ED3

Manual

ED1

1

.66***

.80***

.77***

.69***

.66***

.37***

ED2

 

1

.65***

.58***

.78***

.55***

.24**

ED3

  

1

.67***

.66***

.76***

.38***

Automated

ED1

   

1

.83***

.87***

.51***

ED2

    

1

.79***

.42***

ED3

     

1

.46***

 

TOTd

      

1

  1. aCounting method according to Nachtsheim and Schlich7.
  2. bCounting method according to Masi et al.34.
  3. cCounting method according to Essick et al.5.
  4. dTOT refers to total image area.
Back to article page