Table 1 Optical coherence tomography analysis of stents over-expansion.

From: Comparison of overexpansion capabilities and thrombogenicity at the side branch ostia after implantation of four different drug eluting stents

Ā 

Bioss

Ultimaster

Biomime

Xience

P value

OCT proximal diameter (mm)

Min

5.21 (5.18–5.28)

5.17 (5.11–5.24)

5.14 (5.09–5.22)

5.22 (5.22–5.32)

> 0.05

Mean

5.35 (5.30–5.44)

5.31 (5.27–5.35)

5.30 (5.25–5.34)

5.40 (5.37–5.49)

> 0.05

Max

5.48 (5.41–5.57)

5.47 (5.39–5.56)

5.48 (5.43–5.51)

5.56 (5.50–5.65)

> 0.05

OCT proximal lumen area (mm2)

Area

22.51 (22.03–23.23)

22.15 (21.87–22.54)

22.05 (21.66–22.43)

22.89 (22.63–23.67)

> 0.05

OCT proximal eccentricity index

EI

1.05 (1.04–1.06)

1.05 (1.04–1.06)

1.06 (1.05–1.07)

1.05 (1.04–1.06)

> 0.05

OCT strut analysis

WA (%)

96.5 (92.8–99.1)

82.0 (79.8–82.6)

80.8 (80.6–81.0)

82.0 (77.3–86.0)

> 0.05

Floating (%)

0.0 (0.0–0.7)a

12.7 (12.0–13.6)

17.2 (15.3–18.5)

14.5 (11.6–16.4)

< 0.05

MA (%)

2.0 (0.9–5.0)

6.3 (4.6–8.4)

2.9 (0.6–5.8)

5.1 (4.0–6.4)

> 0.05

  1. Values are presented as median (interquartile range).
  2. EI elliptical index, WA wall apposed, MA malapposed.
  3. aIf p < 0.05 from Biomime.