Table 3 Comparison of classifications of GEDVI_PiC_fem_FJ and GEDVI_PiC_FF versus GEDVI_PiC_JUG. Consistant results between two groups are marked in bold.

From: Comparison of global end-diastolic volume index derived from jugular and femoral indicator injection: a prospective observational study in patients equipped with both a PiCCO-2 and an EV-1000-device

 

GEDVI_PiC_fem_FJ (ml/m2)

GEDVI_PiC_FF (ml/m2)

 

< 680

680 ≤ GEDVI ≤ 800

> 800

< 680

680 ≤ GEDVI ≤ 800

> 800

GEDVI_PiC_JUG (ml/m2)

< 680

2 (14%)

1 (7%)

1 (7%)

4 (29%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

680 ≤ GEDVI ≤ 800

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

4 (29%)

1 (7%)

3 (21%)

0 (0%)

> 800

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

6 (43%)

0 (0%)

1 (7%)

5 (35%)

Back to article page