Table 2 Morphological comparison between Euplotes vanleeuwenhoeki sp. nov. and selected congeners.

From: Morphology, ultrastructure, genomics, and phylogeny of Euplotes vanleeuwenhoeki sp. nov. and its ultra-reduced endosymbiont “Candidatus Pinguicoccus supinus” sp. nov.

Character

Euplotes vanleeuwenhoeki

E. trisulcatus

E. antarcticus

E. euryhalinus

E. charon

E. magnicirratus

Body size in vivo (µm)

40–58 × 25–38

35–50 × 25–40

90–145 × 30–80

50–62 × 26–38

70–100 × 65–90

51–65 × 36–44

Body shape

Elongated ellipsoidal; posterior end rounded

Elongated ellipsoidal; posterior end pointed

Elongated ellipsoidal; posterior end rounded

Elongated oval; posterior end pointed

Oval; posterior end rounded

Oval; posterior end rounded

Peristome (% of the body length)

63

75

65

67

75

75

Number, type of dorsal structures

3, prominent furrows

3, prominent furrows

7–10, prominent DR

Several, inconspicious DR

7, prominent DR

Several, prominent DR

Number of membranelles in AZM

22–29

25–36

46–56

26–28

51–60

49–52

Dargyrome type

Double-eurystomus

Double-eurystomus

Double-eurystomus

Double-eurystomus

Double-eurystomus

Double-eurystomus

Number of dorsolateral kineties

7–8

7

10–11

10

9–10

8

Number of dikinetids in mid-dorsal row

13–14

7–10

11–21

10

22

13–17

Number of FVC

10

10

10

10

10

10

Number of TC

5

5

5

5

5

5

Number of CC

2

2

3–4

2–3

2–4

2

Number of MC

2

2

2

2

2

2

Habitat

Freshwater

Marine

Marine

Euryhaline

Marine

Marine

References

This study

60

59

61

62,63

60

  1. AZM adoral zone of membranelles, CC caudal cirri, DR dorsal ridge, FVC frontoventral cirri, MC marginal cirri, TC transverse cirri.