Table 4 Precision comparison results on ten datasets averaged over 1000 runs.

From: A potential energy and mutual information based link prediction approach for bipartite networks

Dataset

ML

EN

SWN

CL

CM

IC

C2O

Mal

GPC

Drug

PA

.153

.023

.122

.110

.157

.036

.871

.022

.081

.313

CN

.141

.370

.141

.210

.202

.230

.871

.192

.310

.610

JC

.001

.031

.021

.042

.036

.021

.601

.250

.012

.383

CAR

.177

.507

.188

.189

.202

.432

.871

.191

.332

.601

CJC

.184

.496

.188

.217

.231

.494

.871

.232

.361

.191

CAA

.181

.502

.122

.662

.621

.531

.870

.191

.320

.591

CRA

.181

.651

.210

.612

.631

.560

.880

.251

.373

.631

BPR

.181

.501

.162

.620

.641

.442

.931

.253

.271

.680

CS

.120

.330

.163

.165

.455

.349

.661

.142

.201

.491

PLP

.191

.491

.410

.210

.620

.612

.631

.221

.283

.301

NMF

.001

.001

.031

.022

.031

.011

.001

.001

.012

.021

PMIL

.210

.661

.441

.205

.651

.581

.601

.261

.401

.310