Table 1 Table of subjects and fixation results in both groups.

From: Efficacy of biofeedback rehabilitation based on visual evoked potentials analysis in patients with advanced age-related macular degeneration

Patient

Age (years)

Eye

Gender

Stability of fixation (% within 2° and 4°)

RETIMAX

T0

T1

R1

75

R

F

Rel. Unst. 71%, 99%

Stable 83%, 100%

R2

72

R

M

Unstable 64%, 73%

Stable 97%, 99%

R3

68

R

M

Unstable 47%, 69%

Stable 80%, 93%

R4

87

L

M

Unstable 32%, 74%

Rel. Unst. 55%,100%

R5

89

L

F

Rel Unst 70%, 86%

Rel. Unst. 62%, 93%

R6

84

R

M

Rel. Unst. 53%, 98%

Rel. Unst. 71%,99%

R7

85

R

M

Rel. Unst. 66%, 85%

Rel Unst. 74%, 91%

R8

80

R

M

Rel. Unst. 74%, 96%

Rel Unst. 68%, 94%

R9

74

R

M

Rel Unst. 43%, 80%

Rel Unst. 65%, 95%

R10

89

L

F

Rel. Unst. 68%, 98%

Stable 83%,100%

R11

75

L

M

Rel. Unst. 70%, 78%

Rel. Unst. 70%, 94%

R12

88

L

F

Rel. Unst. 50%, 89%

Rel. Unst. 68%,100%

R13

67

R

M

Rel Unst . 58%, 91%

Stable 87%,100%

R14

79

R

F

Rel Unst. 39% 81%

Rel. Unst. 55%, 96%

R15

80

R

F

Rel Unst. 66%, 92%

Stable 78%, 91%

Controls

C1

83

R

F

Rel. Unst. 72%, 99%

Rel. Unst. 72%, 95%

C2

83

R

F

Rel. Unst. 66%, 100%

Rel. Unst. 72%,99%

C3

84

L

F

Rel. Unst. 68%, 99%

Rel. Unst. 69%, 96%

C4

80

R

F

Rel. Unst. 37%, 98%

Rel. Unst. 42% 96%

C5

71

L

M

Rel. Unst. 42%, 95%

Rel. Unst. 55% 91%

C6

87

L

F

Rel. Unst. 73%,100%

Unstable 57%, 74%

C7

78

L

M

Rel. Unst. 70%,99%

Rel. Unst. 74%,100%

C8

67

R

F

Rel. Unst. 66%,99%

Rel. Unst. 59%,93%

C9

80

R

F

Rel. Unst. 72%,99%

Rel. Unst. 55%,98%

  1. R right eye, L left eye, Rel.Unst. relatively unstable; T0 baseline; T1 6-week follow-up, RETIMAX patients who completed the training sessions, CONTROLS patients unavailable to attend the training sessions.