Table 2 Hotspots congruence.
From: Multiple forms of hotspots of tetrapod biodiversity and the challenges of open-access data scarcity
Congruence (% of area shared by hotspots) | Analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grid-cell size | |||||||
12.5 × 12.5 km | 25 × 25 km | 50 × 50 km | |||||
Hotspots definition | Hotspots definition | Hotspots definition | |||||
2.5% | 10% | 2.5% | 10% | 2.5% | 10% | ||
(a) Group | |||||||
All tetrapods | 0 | 6.7 | 0 | 8.8 | 0 | 26.7 | Species Richness + Endemism + Threatened Species Proportion Global |
Amphibia | 0 | 8.1 | 0 | 5.1 | 0 | 18.8 | |
Reptilia | 0 | 20.0 | 0 | 13.3 | 0 | 0 | |
Aves | 0 | 3.7 | 0 | 6.8 | 0 | 6.2 | |
Mammalia | 0 | 17.2 | 0 | 10.0 | 0 | 18.8 | |
All tetrapods | – | – | – | – | – | – | Species Richness + Endemism + Threatened Species Proportion National |
Amphibia | 0 | 18.6 | 0 | 18.2 | 25.0 | 13.3 | |
Reptilia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.8 | 0 | 0 | |
Aves | 0 | 0.9 | 0 | 6.7 | 0 | 14.3 | |
Mammalia | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
All tetrapods | 38.7 | 29.2 | 27.3 | 52.5 | 0 | 38.5 | Species Richness + Endemism + Threatened Species Number Global |
Amphibia | 5.9 | 25.5 | 12.5 | 34.5 | 25.0 | 21.4 | |
Reptilia | 11.5 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 26.2 | 0 | 6.7 | |
Aves | 4.3 | 12.6 | 25.0 | 38.2 | 33.3 | 33.3 | |
Mammalia | 16.7 | 19.6 | 30.0 | 25.6 | 100.0 | 28.6 | |
All tetrapods | – | – | – | – | – | – | Species Richness + Endemism + Threatened Species Number National |
Amphibia | 6.2 | 35.3 | 28.6 | 52.0 | 33.3 | 23.1 | |
Reptilia | 14.8 | 18.9 | 15.4 | 33.3 | 0 | 21.4 | |
Aves | 9.1 | 18.6 | 25.0 | 53.3 | 25.0 | 60.0 | |
Mammalia | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
(b) Type of hotspot | |||||||
Species Richness | 5.4 | 8.2 | 0 | 17.2 | 0 | 5.6 | Amphibia + Reptilia + Aves + Mammalia |
Endemism | 13.6 | 15.1 | 0 | 13.6 | 0 | 5.3 | |
Threat. Sp. Proportion Global | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 | 0 | 0 | |
Threat. Sp. Number Global | 0 | 2.6 | 0 | 14.7 | 0 | 4.8 | |
