Table 4 Comparisons of the proposed method with the latest methods.
From: A deep learning framework combined with word embedding to identify DNA replication origins
Species | Method | Acc | Sp | Sn | MCC | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. cerevisiae (\(S_{1}\)) | iRO-3wPseKNC35 | 0.730 | 0.752 | 0.707 | 0.459 | 0.808 |
iRO-PseKGCC36 | 0.764 | 0.781 | 0.739 | 0.530 | 0.813 | |
iORI-PseKNC2.028 | 0.782 | 0.802 | 0.763 | 0.565 | 0.831 | |
XGBoosting based method32 | 0.895 | 0.938 | 0.852 | 0.793 | – | |
The proposed method | 0.975 | 0.966 | 0.983 | 0.940 | 0.975 | |
S. pombe (\(S_{2}\)) | iRO-3wPseKNC35 | 0.965 | 0.949 | 0.979 | 0.929 | 0.986 |
The proposed method | 0.765 | 0.780 | 0.750 | 0.530 | 0.800 | |
K. lactis (\(S_{3}\)) | iRO-3wPseKNC35 | 0.851 | 0.845 | 0.858 | 0.703 | 0.901 |
The proposed method | 0.885 | 0.912 | 0.858 | 0.771 | 0.888 | |
P. pastoris (\(S_{4}\)) | iRO-3wPseKNC35 | 0.710 | 0.723 | 0.699 | 0.422 | 0.796 |
iRO-PseKGCC36 | 0.742 | 0.739 | 0.745 | 0.484 | 0.800 | |
The proposed method | 0.967 | 0.974 | 0.960 | 0.934 | 0.981 |