Table 2 Characterization of the total sample, divided by transtibial vs transfemoral amputation vs able-bodied group and by control vs intervention groups.

From: A low-cost easily implementable physiotherapy intervention clinically improves gait implying better adaptation to lower limb prosthesis: a randomized clinical trial

Variables

Groups

P-value

Groups

P-value

Transtibial (N = 6)

Transfemoral (N = 8)

Able-bodied (N = 10)

Control (N = 7)

Intervention (N = 7)

Age (years)

38 ± 13

40 ± 11

35 ± 13

0.655AN

37 ± 13

42 ± 9

0.478TT

Height (m)

1.72 ± 0.07

1.74 ± 0.11

1.76 ± 0.04

0.583AN

1.69 ± 0.08

1.77 ± 0.09

0.092TT

Body mass (kg)

75.9 ± 9.4

77.0 ± 12.7

84.5 ± 9.9

0.224AN

75.1 ± 9.6

78.0 ± 12.5

0.642TT

Body mass index (kg/m2)

25.7 ± 2.6

25.2 ± 1.9

27.3 ± 4.1

0.345AN

26.2 ± 1.7

24.6 ± 2.3

0.180TT

Amputation time (months)

12 (7 a 59)

11 (6 a 69)

0.896 MW

12 (6 a 120)

12 (8 a 24)

0.737TT

Amputation cause [Nº. (%)]

Traumatic

4 (66.7)

7 (87.5)

0.538EF

6 (85.7)

5 (71.4)

1.000EF

Vascular

2 (33.3)

1 (12.5)

  

1 (14.3)

2 (28.6)

 

Type of amputation [Nº. (%)]c

       

Transfemoral

3 (42.9)

5 (71.4)

0.280EF

Transtibial

4 (57.1)

2 (28.6)

 
  1. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median (1st to 3rd quartile) or frequencies of occurrence [No. (%)]. AN: One-way ANOVA; MW: Mann Whitney U-test; FE: Fisher's exact test. TT: Student's t-test; a Data presented as mean ± standard deviation; b Data presented as median (1st to 3rd quartile). c Data presented as absolute (No.) and relative (%) frequencies.