Table 3 Occupation-related questionnaire responded by patients who were injured at work. FB foreign body. aValid n = 10. bValid n = 7 in the work-related injury subgroup and 5 in the metal workers and mechanics subgroup.

From: Eye irrigation as a first-line treatment and diagnostic method for emergency department patients who complain of ocular foreign bodies

 

Work-related injury subgroup

n

45

Occupation, n (%)

Metal worker

19 (42)

Mechanic

13 (29)

Others

13 (29)

Wears protective goggles during work, n (%)

Yes

6 (13)

No

36 (80)

Not answered

3 (7)

Reasons not wearing protective goggles, n (%)

Discomfort during wear

4 (9)

Blocks view

10 (22)

Feel not necessary

19 (42)

Not answered

12 (27)

Prior FB incident occurred during work, n (%)

Yes

19 (42)

No

24 (53)

Not answered

2 (4)

Number of FB incident occurred during work, mean (range)a

11.1 (1–50)

Have taken leave from work due to FB incident, n (%)

Yes

4 (9)

No

36 (80)

Not answered

5 (11)

Duration of leave from work due to FB incident, h, mean ± SDb

18.7 (0–80)

Employer have provided educational courses on eye protection, n (%)

Yes

19 (42)

No

23 (51)

Not answered

3 (7)

Employer provides protective googles, n (%)

Yes

28 (62)

No

14 (31)

Not answered

3 (7)