Table 7 Comparative analysis with previous works.
Classification models | Accuracy | Precision | Sensitivity | Specificity | F1 Score | Error rate | Computational time (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCA- GA-SVM—Zhang et al.17 | 0.670 | 0.669 | 0.769 | 0.555 | 0.715 | 0.329 | 2.01 |
Non-invasive approach—Zhang 43 | 0.763 | 0.691 | 0.728 | 0.607 | 0.774 | 0.317 | 3.46 |
Greedy Snake Algorithm—Naveed and Geetha 44 | 0.801 | 0.760 | 0.803 | 0.669 | 0.792 | 0.258 | 3.19 |
ResNet 34—Wang et al. [27] | 0.875 | 0.890 | 0.907 | 0.826 | 0.898 | 0.125 | 3.24 |
SqueezeNet—Wu et al.29 | 0.856 | 0.865 | 0.899 | 0.793 | 0.882 | 0.143 | 3.31 |
AlexNet—Huo et al.18 | 0.863 | 0.870 | 0.905 | 0.801 | 0.887 | 0.137 | 3.27 |
Random forest algorithm—Xiang et al.45 | 0.877 | 0.881 | 0.893 | 0.829 | 0.890 | 0.133 | 3.07 |
Stacking model—Li et al.46 | 0.892 | 0.894 | 0.912 | 0.850 | 0. 917 | 0.119 | 3.61 |
GA_XGBT approach—Li et al.47 | 0.906 | 0.911 | 0.899 | 0.872 | 0.934 | 0.103 | 3.57 |
SVM classifiers—Sagayaraj et al.48 | 0.927 | 0.932 | 0.945 | 0.917 | 0.955 | 0.085 | 3.41 |
Proposed ResNet50-Deep RBFNN model | 0.984 | 0.989 | 0.991 | 0.943 | 0.990 | 0.016 | 3.50 |