Table 3 Comparison of ferroelectric and energy storage properties of recently reported BFO based ceramics samples.
Samples | Applied electric field (kV/cm) | Pmax (µC/cm2) | Pr (µC/cm2) | Energy storage density, Wrec (J/cm3) | Efficiency Ƞ (%) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.70BiFeO0.95Mn0.05O3–0.30CoFe2O4 | – | 1.7 × 10–3 | 6.8 × 10–4 | 0.030 | 59.94 | |
0.70(0.70BiFeO3–0.30BaTiO3)–0.30CoFe2O4 | 12 | 3.59 | 2.97 | 0.037 | 89.40 | |
0.70(0.65BiFeO3–0.30BaTiO3)–0.30Nb2O5 | 90 | 25 | 5.3 | 0.71 | – | |
0.07BiFeO3–0.33BaTiO3–0.60Ba(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3 | 12.5 | 38 | 5.7 | 1.56 | 75 | |
0.90BiFeO3–0.10CoFe2O4 | 30 | 0.134 | 0.088 | 0.138 | 68.65 | Present study |