Table 1 Details and characteristics of studies.

From: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of prophylactic abdominal drainage in major liver resections

Author year

Country

Study type

Number of patients with liver resection

Number of patients with major liver resection

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Type of drain

Indications for surgery

Cirrhotic patients

Total

Drain used

No drain used

Belgithi 1993

France

RCT

81

24

14

10

NCD

Patients with:

1-Bilioenteric anastomosis (n = 6),

2-Gastrointestinal procedure (n = 6),

3-Extended hepatic resection with total vascular exclusion and/or ex situ perfused liver (n = 5),

4-Devitalized hepatic stump tissues

(n = 2),

5-Injury to the common bile duct

(n = 2),

6-Refusal to participate (n = 3)

Closed suction drain

42 (51.8%) with benign lesions and 39 (48.2%) with malignant tumors such as HCC (21 patients), CCC (4 patients) and metastasis (14 patients)

19 (23.4%)

Fong 1996

USA

RCT

120

87

44

43

NCD

Patients with:

1-Refusal to participate,

2-Thoracoabdominal biliary-enteric simultaneous anastomosis,

3-Preoperative placement of a biliary stent

Closed suction drain

84 (70%) had metastatic cancer and 36 (30%) had primary liver pathology

6 (5%) [2 in no-drain group and 4 in drain group]

Kim 2014

Korea

RCT

200

130

64

66

NCD

Patients with:

1-Surgeons preference (n = 1)

2-Intraoperative injury of hepatic duct

(n = 1)

Closed suction drain

50 (25%) with benign lesions [21 in no-drain group and 29 in drain group] and 150 (75%) with malignant tumors [79 in no-drain group and 71in drain group]

108 (54%) [55 in no-drain group and 53 in drain group]

Aldameh 2005

New Zealand

NRS

211

111

79

32

Patients with resection of hepatic parenchyma only

Patients with:

1-Bilioenteric anastomosis

18F closed non-suction drain

31 (14.6%) with benign lesions [19 in no-drain group and 12 in drain group] and 146 (69.2%) with malignant tumors [54 in no-drain group and 92 in drain group]

HCC [20 (9.5%)]

Metastasis [109 (51.6%)]

CCC [8 (3.8%)]

Gallbladder cancer [9 (4.2%)]

NCD

Squires 2015

USA

NRS

1041

1041

564

477

NCD

Patients with:

1-Concurrent biliary reconstruction and anastomosis (n = 198)

Closed drain

215 (20.6%) with benign lesions [96 in no-drain group and 119 in drain group] and 822 (78.9%) with malignant tumors [381 in no-drain group and 441 in drain group]

HCC [123 (11.8%)]

Metastasis [626 (60.1%)]

CCC [73 (7%)]

20 (2%) [7 in no-drain group and 13 in drain group]

Cauchy 2016

France

NRS

223

223

63

160

1-Patients undergoing full laparoscopic major right or left liver resection,

2-Lesions well clear of the midplane

Patients with:

1-Planned ‘‘hand-assisted’’ or ‘‘hybrid’’ approach,

2-Total vascular exclusion without or with liver cooling,

3-Reconstruction of major vascular were required

NCD

26 (11.7%) with benign lesions and 197 (88.3%) with malignant tumors

HCC [44 (19.7%)]

Metastasis [112 (50.2%)]

CCC [27 (12.1%)]

Others [14 (6.3%)]

NCD

Shwaartz 2017

USA

NRS

1005

1005

500

505

Patients with major liver resection

Patients with:

1. Minor hepatectomy (n = 1,246),

2. Biliary reconstruction,

3. Missing info (n = 17)

NCD

159 (15.8%) with benign lesions [71 in no-drain group and 88 in drain group] and 785 (78.1%) with malignant tumors [377 in no-drain group and 408 in drain group]

Hepatobiliary cancers [271 (27%)]

Metastasis [514 (51.1%)]

83 (8.2%) [28 in no-drain group and 55 in drain group]

Martin 2018

USA

NRS

6861

2429

1342

1087

Adult patients ≥ 18 years old

Patients with:

1.Missing bile leak variable (n = 59),

2.Unknown or missing final pathologic diagnosis (n = 7),

3.An ICD-9 code indicating neoplasm of uncertain behavior

NCD

5226 (76.2%) malignant tumors

NCD

Total

  

9742

5050

2670

2380

     
  1. RCT Randomized controlled trial, NRS non-randomized studies, NCD not clearly defined, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, CCC cholangiocarcinoma.