Table 2 Characteristics of included studies.

From: Effects of open-label placebos in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Title

Author

Country

Year

Condition

N

Female sex. %

Mean age, years

Treatment

Control treatment

Duration

Number of prim. outcomes

Primary outcome used for meta-analysis

Rational for choice

Open-label placebo treatment in chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

Carvalho et al.30

Portugal

2016

Chronic low back pain

83

71

44

OLP (n = 41)

Treatment as usual (n = 42)

21 days

2

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

Most clinically relevant

Open-Label Placebo Treatment for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial

Hoenemeyer et al.31

US

2018

Cancer-related fatigue

74

67

57

OLP (n = 39)

Treatment as usual (n = 35)

21 days

2

Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI-14)

Most clinically relvant

Altered Placebo and Drug Labeling Changes the Outcome of Episodic Migraine Attacks

Kam-Hansen et al.32

US

2014

Migraine attacks

66

85

41

OLP (n = 66)

No treatment (n = 66) (within subject)

7 migraine attacks

1

Change in headache, pain score

Only primary outcome

Placebos without Deception: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Kaptchuk et al.21

US

2010

Irritable bowel syndrome

80

70

47

OLP (n = 37)

No treatment (n = 43)

21 days

1

IBSa Global Improvement Scale

Only primary outcome

Open-Label Placebo for Major Depressive Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Kelley et al.37

US

2012

Major depressive disorder

20

70

39

OLP (n = 11)

Waitlist (n = 9)

14 days

1

17-item Hamilton scale for depression

Only primary outcome

Effects of open-label placebo on pain, functional disability and spine mobility in chronic back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial

Kleine-Borgmann et al.33

Germany

2019

Chronic back pain

122

72

59

OLP (n = 63)

Treatment as usual (n = 59)

21 days

1

Composite pain intensity score 0–10

Only primary outcome

Open-Label placebo for the treatment of unipolar depression: Results from a randomized controlled trial. (in press)

Nitzan et al.34

Israel

2020

Major depressive disorder

38

74

50

OLP (n = 18)

Treatment as usual (n = 20)

28 days

1

QIDS

Only primary outcome

Open-label placebos for menopausal hot flushes—a randomized controlled trial

Pan et al.28

Germany

2020

Menopausal hot flushes

100

100

55

OLP (n = 50)

No treatment (n = 50)

4 weeks

2

Hot flush score

Most clinically relevant

Conditioned Placebo Dose Reduction: A new treatment in ADHD?

Sandler et al.19

US

2010

ADHD

93

22

10

Dose reduced/Placebo (n = 33)

Reduced Dose (n = 29), Full Dose (n = 31)a

8 weeks

1

IOWA Connoers Rating Scale (Parent Version)

Only primary outcome (parents closer to child)

Open-label use of placebos in the treatment of ADHD: a pilot study

Sandler and Bodfish20

US

2008

ADHD

26

27

Not stated (range 7 to 15)

OLP (n = 26)

50% of baseline medication (n = 26) (cross-over design)

21 days

4

Seven-point clinical global impression

Includes different perspectives

Open-label placebos improve symptoms in allergic rhinitis: A randomized controlled trial

Schaefer et al.38

Germany

2016

Allergic Rhinitis

25

84

26

OLP (n = 12)

Treatment as usual (n = 13)

14 days

2

Symptoms (self-developed questionnaire)

Most clinically relevant

Why do open-label placebos work? A randomized controlled trial of an open-label placebo induction with and without extended information about the placebo effect in allergic rhinitis

Schaefer et al.35

Germany

2018

Allergic Rhinitis

46

80

25

OLP with briefing (n = 13) OLP without briefing (n = 13)

TAU + (n = 9), TAU- (n = 11)

14 days

2

Symptoms (self-developed questionnaire)

Most clinically relevant

Open-label placebo reduces fatigue in cancer survivors: a randomized trial

Zhou et al.36

China

2019

Cancer-Related Fatigue

40

92

47

OLP (n = 20)

No treatment (n = 20)

21 days

1

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatique (FACIT-F)

Only primary outcome

  1. IBS irritable bowel syndrom.
  2. a“Full dose group” was excluded. We only compared the “reduced dose” group to the “reduced dose + placebo” group, which was scored as TAU.