Table 2 QTL analysis of fruit traits in bitter gourd in F2:3 family lines.

From: Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of yield and fruit traits in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.)

S. No

Trait

QTL*

LGy

QTL Position (cM)

Flanking markers

Marker closest to peak

Closeness of marker to trait (cM)

R2 (%)

LOD

Additive effect#

Left marker

Right marker

1

Fruit length (cm)

qFL1

1

28.81

TP_3003

TP_2693

TP_3003

1.51

9.69

2.7

 − 1.84

qFL5

5

77.48

TP_11213

TP_11334

TP_11334

1.82

13.04

3.6

 − 2.12

qFL14

14

55.54

TP_67839

TP_68143

TP_67839

0.04

11.21

3.4

2.02

2

Fruit diameter (cm)

qFD1

1

55.8

TP_1877

TP_1459

TP_1459

0.10

9.63

2.6

 − 0.60

qFD3

3

55.86

TP_8845

TP_8817

TP_8817

0.74

0.10

15.8

0.06

qFD13

13

90.49

TP_57231

TP_56896

TP_57231

0.49

0.27

9.3

0.10

qFD15

15

66.54

TP_66813

TP_66819

TP_66813

0.04

6.16

2.5

0.49

qFD16

16

77.12

TP_74581

TP_74591

TP_74591

4.78

32.65

15.7

 − 1.12

qFD20

20

53

TP_78027

TP_75976

TP_78027

0.50

9.46

2.8

 − 0.61

3

Fruit weight (g)

qFW1

1

55.8

TP_1877

TP_1459

TP_1459

0.10

10.81

3.1

 − 12.48

qFW15

15

71.88

TP_67045

TP_67087

TP_67045

2.48

9.17

3.6

11.82

qFW20

20

55.5

TP_78027

TP_75976

TP_78027

3.00

9.36

2.6

 − 11.62

4

Fruit flesh thickness (mm)

qFT14

14

80.12

TP_68612

TP_68958

TP_68958

0.48

0.09

2.6

0.10

5

Number of fruits per plant

qFN5

5

76.98

TP_11213

TP_11334

TP_11334

2.32

9.07

2.5

 − 2.66

qFN14

14

122.25

TP_69841

TP_69846

TP_69841

1.85

8.20

2.6

 − 2.51

qFN20

20

50.47

TP_78598

TP_78027

TP_78027

2.03

13.81

3.6

 − 3.27

6

Yield per plant (g)

qYD1

1

55.8

TP_1877

TP_1459

TP_1459

0.10

10.19

3.1

 − 223.07

qYD15

15

71.88

TP_67045

TP_67087

TP_67045

2.48

4.88

2.6

161.47

qYD20

20

53

TP_78027

TP_75976

TP_78027

0.50

8.21

2.5

 − 200.97

  1. *QTL named as qxxxy, with “xxx” being the trait abbreviation, ‘y’ the number of the linkage group. # Additive effect was positive when the “DBGy-201” allele increased the trait score and was negative when the “Pusa Do Mausami” allele increased trait score. The 95% confidence interval of the QTL locations was determined with 2-LOD support interval which was defined by left and right markers.