Table 2 Summary of validation and prediction performance based on DT-Cubist in 15 phenotypes for tea quality-related metabolites.

From: Potential of spectroscopic analyses for non-destructive estimation of tea quality-related metabolites in fresh new leaves

Phenotypes

Observed values (mg cm−2)

DT-cubist

Model performancea

RPDv

R2v

RMSEv (mg cm−2)

RPDp

R2p

RMSEp (mg cm−2)

Catechins

GC

21.2

 ± 

13.7

2.22

 ± 

0.30

0.79

 ± 

0.06

5.96

 ± 

1.01

2.10

 ± 

0.30

0.78

 ± 

0.06

6.70

 ± 

0.90

Accurate

C

5.3

 ± 

3.3

1.56

 ± 

0.20

0.59

 ± 

0.11

2.20

 ± 

0.43

1.50

 ± 

0.20

0.58

 ± 

0.10

2.10

 ± 

0.30

Acceptable

CG

7.5

 ± 

4.2

1.18

 ± 

0.11

0.29

 ± 

0.12

3.56

 ± 

0.56

1.10

 ± 

0.10

0.21

 ± 

0.09

3.80

 ± 

0.50

Poor

EC

67.4

 ± 

53.2

2.23

 ± 

0.38

0.80

 ± 

0.07

23.86

 ± 

4.80

2.00

 ± 

0.30

0.77

 ± 

0.06

27.70

 ± 

4.70

Accurate

ECG

119.3

 ± 

77.2

2.17

 ± 

0.29

0.79

 ± 

0.06

33.66

 ± 

5.82

2.00

 ± 

0.20

0.77

 ± 

0.06

40.00

 ± 

5.30

Accurate

EGC

317.6

 ± 

212.1

2.80

 ± 

0.37

0.87

 ± 

0.04

75.34

 ± 

10.80

2.70

 ± 

0.40

0.86

 ± 

0.03

80.70

 ± 

10.00

Accurate

EGCG

320.6

 ± 

107.9

1.50

 ± 

0.19

0.55

 ± 

0.11

71.87

 ± 

10.26

1.50

 ± 

0.20

0.54

 ± 

0.09

72.80

 ± 

8.70

Acceptable

EGCG3Me

10.8

 ± 

7.4

1.44

 ± 

0.17

0.54

 ± 

0.11

5.08

 ± 

0.78

1.40

 ± 

0.10

0.47

 ± 

0.11

5.70

 ± 

0.70

Poor

Total

869.7

 ± 

423.2

2.46

 ± 

0.46

0.83

 ± 

0.06

171.14

 ± 

30.96

2.50

 ± 

0.40

0.84

 ± 

0.05

175.70

 ± 

28.30

Accurate

FAAs

Asp

15.4

 ± 

10.7

2.18

 ± 

0.31

0.80

 ± 

0.06

5.02

 ± 

0.62

2.20

 ± 

0.30

0.81

 ± 

0.05

4.80

 ± 

0.50

Accurate

Glu

17.6

 ± 

8.8

1.70

 ± 

0.18

0.66

 ± 

0.07

5.10

 ± 

0.54

1.70

 ± 

0.20

0.68

 ± 

0.07

5.20

 ± 

0.50

Acceptable

Arg

51.1

 ± 

70.9

1.88

 ± 

0.32

0.71

 ± 

0.10

39.16

 ± 

7.60

1.80

 ± 

0.30

0.67

 ± 

0.11

41.00

 ± 

7.30

Acceptable

Thea

69.9

 ± 

65.3

1.98

 ± 

0.26

0.74

 ± 

0.07

33.52

 ± 

4.89

2.00

 ± 

0.30

0.74

 ± 

0.08

34.10

 ± 

4.70

Acceptable

Total

181.2

 ± 

171.7

2.25

 ± 

0.34

0.80

 ± 

0.06

78.23

 ± 

11.12

2.20

 ± 

0.30

0.78

 ± 

0.06

81.00

 ± 

11.00

Accurate

Caffeine

183.4

 ± 

68.7

1.39

 ± 

0.19

0.48

 ± 

0.13

49.58

 ± 

8.35

1.40

 ± 

0.20

0.50

 ± 

0.11

51.80

 ± 

6.90

Acceptable

  1. v” and “p” in each index means validation and prediction, respectively.
  2. aPrediction performance is represented as described by Chang et al., (2001); RPDp > 2.0, accurate prediction; 1.4 < RPDp < 2.0, acceptable prediction; RPDp < 1.4, poor prediction.