Table 3 Stable SNPs identified simultaneously in different environments and different methods associated with plant height and flag leaf length.

From: Uncovering genomic regions controlling plant architectural traits in hexaploid wheat using different GWAS models

Trait

Years

Methods (1–4)

SNP

Chr

Position (bp)

LOD > 3

r2 (%)

PH

2016, 2017

2016 (1, 4), 2017 (1, 2)

Kukri_c34553_89

2B

887912

3.22–6.43

1.95–3.42

2016, 2017

2016 (1, 2, 3, 4), 2017 (1, 2, 3)

RAC875_c8121_1490

3A

1272572

4.98–9.25

5.67–13.88

2016, 2017

2016 (1, 4)

wsnp_Ex_rep_c66315_64480362

6B

3350804

3.12–6.78

3.10–5.73

2016, 2017, 2018

2016 (1, 2, 4), 2017 (1, 4)

Ku_c5191_340

6B

3397322

3.05–9.30

0.72–12.99

FLL

2017, 2018

2017 (1, 2)

tplb0049a09_1302

5A

2453837

3.88–7.17

5.04–13.14

  1. Methods (1–4): Corresponding four multi-locus GWAS methods i.e. mrMLM, FASTmrMLM, FASTmrEMMA, and pLARmEB, respectively. r2 (%) represents proportion of total phenotypic variation explained by each SNP. PH (plant height); FLL (flag leaf length).
Back to article page