Figure 5
From: An analytical method reduces noise bias in motor adaptation analysis
Comparison of different trial-by-trial adaptation rate calculation methods. (a–b) Simulation and parameter settings as in Fig. 3 for changing control noise with R = 1 (a) and changing sensory noise with Q = 1 (b). For clarity, the one standard deviation shaded range is shown only for the analytic results (see Figs. 3 and 4 for variability shading for other analysis methods). (c, d) Performance of each analysis method shown in (a) and (b) as measured using the mean squared error compared to the gold adaptation rate for changing control noise (c) and sensory noise (d).
