Table 2 Comparative analysis of conventional method and LAMP detection of ML.
LAMP | Conventional Method Positive | Conventional Method Negative | Total | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | 12 | 0 | 12 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Negative | 0 | 6 | 6 | – | – | – | – |
Total | 12 | 6 | 18 | – | – | – | – |
