Table 2 Comparison of the experimentally fitted control gains \((\bar{p}, \bar{d})\) to \((\hat{p}, \hat{d})\) (H1) and to \((p^*,d^*)\) (H2) by means of Wilcoxon signed-rank test: rejection of H1 and H2 is indicated by h (\(h=0\) means that significant difference is not proven statistically, \(h=1\) means that there is statistical difference), p-value (\(v_p\)).
No. | H1: | \(\bar{p}\) vs. \(\hat{p}\) | H1: | \(\bar{d}\) vs. \(\hat{d}\) | H2: | \(\bar{p}\) vs. \(p^*\) | H2: | \(\bar{d}\) vs. \(d^*\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
h | \(v_p\) | h | \(v_p\) | h | \(v_p\) | h | \(v_p\) | |
1. | 1 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.911 | 1 | 0.004 | 0 | 0.823 |
2. | 0 | 0.881 | 0 | 0.765 | 1 | 0.005 | 0 | 0.126 |
3. | 0 | 0.681 | 0 | 0.502 | 0 | 0.681 | 0 | 0.940 |
4. | 0 | 0.062 | 0 | 0.911 | 1 | 0.030 | 0 | 0.073 |
5. | 0 | 0.765 | 0 | 0.940 | 1 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 |
6. | 1 | 0.011 | 0 | 0.940 | 0 | 0.086 | 1 | 0.000 |
7. | 0 | 0.940 | 0 | 0.823 | 1 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 |
8. | 0 | 0.093 | 0 | 0.654 | 0 | 0.263 | 0 | 0.108 |
9. | 0 | 0.117 | 0 | 0.765 | 1 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.002 |
10. | 0 | 0.062 | 0 | 0.156 | 1 | 0.001 | 0 | 0.627 |
all | 0 | 0.391 | 0 | 0.852 | 1 | 0.003 | 1 | 0.030 |
