Table 1 Cardiac volumes.

From: Impact of fully automated assessment on interstudy reproducibility of biventricular volumes and function in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

 

Exp

Exam 1

Exp

Exam 2

p

Inexp

Exam 1

Inexp

Exam 2

p

Automated

Exam 1

Automated

Exam 2

p

LV Mass (g/m2)

104 ± 35

102 ± 34

0.184

101 ± 27

104 ± 36

0.879

103 ± 39

100 ± 36

0.088

LV EDV (ml/m2)

176 ± 55

173 ± 51

0.267

162 ± 44

171 ± 57

0.199

170 ± 50

173 ± 56

0.500

LV ESV (ml/m2)

84 ± 46

82 ± 40

0.396

75 ± 37

81 ± 47

0.215

80 ± 42

81 ± 45

0.557

LV SV (ml/m2)

91 ± 21

91 ± 20

0.679

87 ± 24

90 ± 20

0.327

90 ± 19

92 ± 18

0.316

LV EF (%)

54 ± 11

54 ± 9

0.744

55 ± 11

55 ± 11

0.601

55 ± 10

56 ± 9

0.499

RV EDV (ml/m2)

140 ± 29

143 ± 30

0.064

155 ± 39

161 ± 45

0.122

153 ± 37

161 ± 44

0.045

RV ESV (ml/m2)

56 ± 18

55 ± 16

0.500

82 ± 25

84 ± 27

0.711

67 ± 23

75 ± 27

0.011

RV SV (ml/m2)

84 ± 15

88 ± 17

0.039

73 ± 23

77 ± 23

0.472

86 ± 19

85 ± 25

0.523

RV EF (ml/m2)

60 ± 7

62 ± 5

0.043

47 ± 9

48 ± 8

0.811

57 ± 7

53 ± 8

0.041

  1. Cardiac volumes as assessed manually by the experienced (exp) and inexperienced (inexp.) observer as well as fully automated. Volumes are reported as mean ± standard deviation. LV mass is reported in gram, volumes in ml and EF in %.
  2. P-values in bold type indicate statistical significance < 0.05.
  3. LV left ventricular, RV right ventricular, EDV end-diastolic volume, ESV end-systolic volume, SV stroke volume, EF ejection fraction.
Back to article page