Table 1 Experimental design for integrity test after UV treatment on N95 respirators (9210 and 8110S models).

From: Assessing the impact of multiple ultraviolet disinfection cycles on N95 filtering facepiece respirator integrity

Respirator model

Designation

Number of UV cyclesa

Total UV fluence per side (mJ cm−2)

Total UV fluence applied (mJ cm−2)

Replicates

9210

Fit Test

5

5000–5710

10,000–11,420

2

10

10,000–11,420

20,000–22,840

2

Integrity

0

0

0

1

5

5000–5710

10,000–11,420

1

10

10,000–11,420

20,000–22,840

1

Air Flow

0

0

0

3

5

5000–5710

10,000–11,420

3

10

10,000–11,420

20,000–22,840

3

Strap tensile loading test

0

0

0

4

5

5000

10,000

6

10

10,000

20,000

6

8110S

Fit Test

5

5000–5710

10,000–11,420

2

10

10,000–11,420

20,000–22,840

2

Integrity

0

0

0

1

5

5000–5710

10,000–11,420

1

10

10,000–11,420

20,000–22,840

1

Air Flow

0

0

0

3

5

5000–5710

10,000–11,420

3

10

10,000–11,420

20,000–22,840

3

Strap tensile loading test

0

0

0

4

5

5000

10,000

3

10

10,000

20,000

3

  1. aEach UV cycle consisted of a 180-s treatment duration per side of the respirator. In treating each side of the respirator, a full UV cycle (360 s) delivered a fluence of 1000 and 1142 mJ cm−2 to the farthest and closest point on the respirator to the light source, respectively. Over five cycles, the total fluence applied to each respirator was 10,000 mJ cm−2 (for the region of the respirator farthest from the light source) and 11,420 mJ cm−2 (for the area of the respirator closest to the light source). Similarly, 10 UV cycles delivered a total fluence for each FFR of 20,000 to 22,840 mJ cm−2.