Table 4 Performance of the mortality prediction models tested in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health.

From: Machine learning enhances the performance of short and long-term mortality prediction model in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

 

STEMI

NSTEMI

AUC (95% CI)

Specificity

Sensitivity

Accuracy

F1-score

AUC (95% CI)

Specificity

Sensitivity

Accuracy

F1-score

In-hospital mortality

In-hospital mortality

Machine learning algorithms

Machine learning algorithms

LR with Lasso

0.923 (0.897–0.948)

0.877

0.807

0.876

0.124

0.916 (0.891–0.941)

0.848

0.787

0.847

0.096

LR with Ridge

0.923 (0.898–0.948)

0.755

0.982

0.757

0.081

0.918 (0.894–0.942)

0.868

0.770

0.867

0.107

LR with Elastic net

0.923 (0.898–0.948)

0.884

0.754

0.883

0.123

0.917 (0.893–0.941)

0.845

0.803

0.845

0.096

RF

0.924 (0.897–0.952)

0.815

0.860

0.816

0.092

0.924 (0.903–0.946)

0.860

0.803

0.860

0.106

SVM

0.875 (0.844–0.907)

0.772

0.807

0.773

0.072

0.848 (0.815–0.880)

0.723

0.852

0.725

0.060

XGBoost

0.938 (0.920–0.955)

0.855

0.860

0.855

0.114

0.911 (0.885–0.937)

0.832

0.787

0.832

0.088

Traditional model

Traditional model

TIMI

0.866 (0.820–0.913)

0.774

0.807

0.774

0.072

0.672 (0.612–0.731)

0.693

0.590

0.692

0.038

GRACE

0.921 (0.891–0.950)

0.851

0.825

0.850

0.107

0.917 (0.890–0.944)

0.799

0.852

0.800

0.081

12-month mortality

12-month mortality

Machine learning algorithms

Machine learning algorithms

LR with Lasso

0.789 (0.719–0.860)

0.751

0.696

0.750

0.048

0.815 (0.781–0.848)

0.727

0.720

0.726

0.100

LR with Ridge

0.789 (0.718–0.859)

0.636

0.761

0.637

0.037

0.809 (0.774–0.843)

0.735

0.695

0.735

0.099

LR with Elastic net

0.789 (0.721–0.858)

0.721

0.696

0.721

0.044

0.814 (0.780–0.847)

0.749

0.695

0.748

0.104

RF

0.772 (0.702–0.843)

0.572

0.826

0.575

0.034

0.792 (0.751–0.832)

0.746

0.703

0.745

0.104

SVM

0.687 (0.606–0.768)

0.425

0.804

0.429

0.025

0.721 (0.676–0.765)

0.662

0.695

0.663

0.080

XGBoost

0.796 (0.736–0.857)

0.701

0.717

0.701

0.042

0.808 (0.773–0.843)

0.783

0.653

0.781

0.111

Traditional model

Traditional model

TIMI

0.701 (0.633–0.769)

0.624

0.804

0.626

0.038

0.676 (0.635–0.717)

0.693

0.590

0.692

0.038

GRACE

0.738 (0.671–0.806)

0.650

0.761

0.651

0.038

0.778 (0.741–0.814)

0.799

0.852

0.800

0.081

  1. AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; LR, Logistic regression; Lasso, L1 penalty; Ridge, L2 penalty; Elastic net, Elastic net penalty; RF, Random Forest; SVM, Support Vector Machine; XGBoost, Extreme Gradient Boosting.