Table 1 Study characteristics table.

From: Efficacy of hypertonic dextrose injection (prolotherapy) in temporomandibular joint dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Title

Year

Sample size

Sample analyzed

Intervention group

Control group(s)

Mean age

Female (%)

DPT Inj. sites

Dextrose volume/inj

DPT inj. frequency

Outcomes

Assessment time points

Duration (weeks)

1

The Efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy for temporomandibular joint hypermobility: a preliminary prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Refai 2011

N = 12

N = 12

Gp A (n = 6):2 ml 10% dextrose + 1 ml 2% mepivacaine

Gp B (n = 6): 2 ml NS + 1 ml 2% mepivacaine

26.42 ± 5.66

83.30%

IA (superior joint space)

Superior and inferior capsular attachment

3 ml

4 inj.; 6-week apart

*Pain (4 scales: no, mild, moderate and severe)

Number of luxations (locking /month)

MMO (cm)

Week 0, 6, 12, 18 and 30

30

2

Is dextrose prolotherapy superior to placebo for the treatment of temporomandibular joint hypermobility? A randomized clinical trial

Kilic 2016

N = 30

N = 26

Gp A (n = 14): 2 ml dextrose 30% dextrose + 2 ml NS + 1 ml 2% mepivacaine

Gp B (n = 12): 4 ml NS + 1 ml 2% mepivacaine

30.81 ± 11.60

73%

IA (superior joint space)

posterior disc attachment

Superior and inferior capsular attachment

Stylo-mandibular ligament

5 ml

3 inj.; 4-week apart

Vas pain 0–10

Masticatory efficiency VAS 0–10

Joint sounds VAS 0–10

Painless mouth openning mm

MMO (mm)

Lateral motion (mm)

Protrusion motion (mm)

0, 52

52

3

Change of site of intra-articular injection of hypertonic dextrose resulted in different effects of treatment

Fouda 2018

N = 72

N = 72

25% dextrose + 2% mepivaine

Gp A (n = 18):sup. Joint space

25% dextrose + 2% mepivaine at different injection sites:Gp B (n = 18):capsule

Gp C (n = 18): inferior joint space

Gp D (n = 18): retrodiscal tisse

Mean 30 (SD 18–42)

77.80%

Gp A: superior jt space

Gp B: capsule

Gp C: inferior jt space

Gp D : retrodiscal tissue

1.5 ml

4 inj.; weekly

VAS 0–100

Week 0, 2, 12

12

4

Evaluation of the efficacy of different concentrations of dextrose prolotherapy in temporomandibular joint hypermobility treatment

Mustafa 2018

N = 40

N = 37

Gp A (n = 9): 1.5 ml 20% dextrose + 1.5 ml 2% lidacaine

Gp B (n = 10) : 1.5 ml 10% dextrose + 1.5 ml 2% lidacaine

Gp C (n = 9): 1.5 ml 30% dextrose + 1.5 ml 2%lidacaine

Gp D (n = 9): 1.5 ml NS + 1.5 ml 2% lidocaine

25 ± 6.54

70%

IA (superior joint space)

Posterior disc attachment

Superior and inferior capsular attachment

3 ml

4 inj.; 4 weeks apart

VAS 0–10

MMO (mm)

Luxation per month( yes/no)

Joint sounds (yes/no)

week 0, 4, 8, 12, 16

16

5

Treatment of temporomandibular dysfunction with hypertonic dextrose injection (Prolotherapy): a randomized controlled trial with long-term partial crossover

Louw 2018

N = 42

N = 40

Gp A (n = 22): 20% dextrose + 0.2% lidocaine

Gp B (n = 20): water + 0.2% lidocaine

46 ± 14

83%

IA (superior joint space)

1 ml

3 inj.; 4 weeks apart

NRS 0–10 Pain

NRS 0–10 function MIO (mm)

week 0, 4, 8, 12, 52

52 (open label after week 12)

6

Sodium hyaluronic acid, platelet rich plasma and dextrose prolotherapy in management of temporo-mandibular joint internal derangement. A comparative study

Mahmoud 2018

N = 45

not reported

Gp A (n = 15):12.5 dextrose + 2% lidocaine

Gp B (n = 15 ): hyaluronic acid

Gp C (n = 15): platelet rich plasma

Age range (20–50)

62.20%

IA (posterior joint space)

Anterior disc attachement

Messeter muscle attachment

3 ml

3 inj.; 2 weeks apart

*VAS 0–10

*MIO (mm)

*Mandibular deviation (yes/no)

Week 0, 4, 12, 24, 52

52

7

Dextrose prolotherapy in the treatment of recurrent temporomandibular joint dislocation (clinical study)

Saadat 2018

N = 16

N = 16

25% dextrose + 2% lidocaine

Gp A (n = 8) : superior joint space

25% dextrose + 2% lidocaine

Gp B (n = 8) : retrodiscal ligamament

29.5 (age range 23 to 40 )

69%

Gp A-superior joint space ; Gp B -retrodiscal ligament

2 ml

Single inj. at week 0

*VAS 0–10

*MIO (cm)

*Number of dislocation per week

Week 0, 2, 4, 12, 24

24

8

Assessment of the therapeutic effects for autologous blood versys dextrose prolotherapy for the treatment of temporo-mandibular joint hypermobility: a randomized prospective clinical study

Arafat 2019

N = 30

Not reported

Gp A (n = 15):10% dextrose + 2% mepivacaine

Gp B (n = 15): autologous blood

18–39 years old

37%

IA (superior joint space)

superior and inferior capsular attachment

3 ml

3 inj. 2-weeks apart

*VAS 0–10

*MIO (mm)

Week 0, 2, 12, 24

24

9

Dextrose prolotherapy versus lidocaine injection for temporomandibular dysfunction: a pragmatic randomized controlled triala

Zarate 2020

N = 29

N = 27

GP A (n = 15): 20% dextrose + 0.2% lidocaine

Gp B (n = 14): water + 0.2% lidocaine

47 ± 17

86%

IA (superior joint space)

1 ml

3 inj.; 4-weeks apart

NRS 0–10 Pain

NRS 0–10 function

MIO (mm)

Week 0, 4, 8, 12, 52

52 (open label after week 12)

10

Dextrose prolotherapy versus low level laser therapy (LLLT) for Management of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD): clinical randomized controlled study

Hassanien 2020

N = 20

N = 20

Gp A (n = 10): 12.5% dextrose + 2% lidocaine

Gp B (n = 10): laser (3 times per week for 4 weeks)

26 ± 4

50%

IA (posterior joint space)

Anterior disc attachement

Messeter muscle attachment

3 ml

3 inj.; 2-week apart

VAS 0–10

MMO (mm)

Week 2, 4

4

  1. Gp group, DPT hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy, IA Intra-articular, VAS visual analog scale, NRS numerical rating scale, MIO maximum incisor opening, MM minimeter, NS normal saline.
  2. *Raw figures not provided.